» Articles » PMID: 35279733

Protein-rich Food Intake and Risk of Spontaneous Abortion: a Prospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Eur J Nutr
Date 2022 Mar 13
PMID 35279733
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Diet quality is increasingly recognized as important for human reproductive capacity. We studied the association between intake of protein-rich foods and risk of spontaneous abortion (SAB).

Methods: During 2013-2020, we recruited pregnancy planners from the United States and Canada (Pregnancy Study Online; PRESTO) and Denmark (SnartForaeldre.dk; SF). Participants completed a baseline questionnaire and a validated cohort-specific food frequency questionnaire. We estimated preconception intake of red meat, poultry, processed meat, seafood, eggs, plant-based proteins, and dairy from individual foods and mixed recipes. We included 4,246 PRESTO and 2,953 SF participants who reported a pregnancy during the study. Data on SAB were derived from questionnaires and population registries. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), representing the effect of substituting one type of protein-rich food for another.

Results: SAB risk was 23% in PRESTO and 16% in SF. In PRESTO, substitution of seafood with other protein-rich foods was associated with higher SAB risk [for example, the HR for replacing 100 g of seafood/week with 100 g of red meat was 1.10 (95% CI 1.00, 1.20)]. In contrast, in SF, substituting seafood with other protein-rich foods was associated with lower SAB risk [HR for replacing 100 g of seafood/week with 100 g of red meat was 0.89 (95% CI 0.82, 0.98)]. Other protein-rich food substitutions were not meaningfully associated with SAB risk.

Conclusions: Preconception intake of protein-rich foods was largely unrelated to SAB risk, with the exception of seafood, which was associated with higher risk of SAB in Denmark, but a lower risk in North America.

Citing Articles

Predictive models of miscarriage on the basis of data from a preconception cohort study.

Yland J, Zad Z, Wang T, Wesselink A, Jiang T, Hatch E Fertil Steril. 2024; 122(1):140-149.

PMID: 38604264 PMC: 11651128. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.04.007.


Dietary protein in early pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study.

Luo T, Chen H, Wei H, Yang Y, Wei F, Chen W Endocrine. 2023; 83(2):357-367.

PMID: 37721649 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-023-03517-1.

References
1.
Mukherjee S, Velez Edwards D, Baird D, Savitz D, Hartmann K . Risk of miscarriage among black women and white women in a U.S. Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2013; 177(11):1271-8. PMC: 3664339. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws393. View

2.
Avalos L, Galindo C, Li D . A systematic review to calculate background miscarriage rates using life table analysis. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012; 94(6):417-23. DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23014. View

3.
Bruckner T, Mortensen L, Catalano R . Spontaneous Pregnancy Loss in Denmark Following Economic Downturns. Am J Epidemiol. 2016; 183(8):701-8. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kww003. View

4.
Quenby S, Gallos I, Dhillon-Smith R, Podesek M, Stephenson M, Fisher J . Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss. Lancet. 2021; 397(10285):1658-1667. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00682-6. View

5.
Gaskins A, Chavarro J . Diet and fertility: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 218(4):379-389. PMC: 5826784. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.08.010. View