» Articles » PMID: 35273301

Anti-cancer Treatment Schedule Optimization Based on Tumor Dynamics Modelling Incorporating Evolving Resistance

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Mar 11
PMID 35273301
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Quantitative characterization of evolving tumor resistance under targeted treatment could help identify novel treatment schedules, which may improve the outcome of anti-cancer treatment. In this study, a mathematical model which considers various clonal populations and evolving treatment resistance was developed. With parameter values fitted to the data or informed by literature data, the model could capture previously reported tumor burden dynamics and mutant KRAS levels in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab. Treatment schedules, including a continuous schedule, intermittent schedules incorporating treatment holidays, and adaptive schedules guided by ctDNA measurements were evaluated using simulations. Compared with the continuous regimen, the simulated intermittent regimen which consisted of 8-week treatment and 4-week suspension prolonged median progression-free survival (PFS) of the simulated population from 36 to 44 weeks. The median time period in which the tumor size stayed below the baseline level (T) was prolonged from 52 to 60 weeks. Extending the treatment holiday resulted in inferior outcomes. The simulated adaptive regimens showed to further prolong median PFS to 56-64 weeks and T to 114-132 weeks under different treatment designs. A prospective clinical study is required to validate the results and to confirm the added value of the suggested schedules.

Citing Articles

Predicting Tumor Volume Doubling Time and Progression-Free Survival in Untreated Patients from Patient-Derived-Xenograft (PDX) Models: A Translational Model-Based Approach.

Tosca E, Ronchi D, Rocchetti M, Magni P AAPS J. 2024; 26(5):92.

PMID: 39117850 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-024-00960-4.


Quantitative modeling of tumor dynamics and development of drug resistance in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with erlotinib.

Yin A, Veerman G, van Hasselt J, Steendam C, Dubbink H, Guchelaar H CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024; 13(4):612-623.

PMID: 38375997 PMC: 11015077. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.13105.


Support to early clinical decisions in drug development and personalised medicine with checkpoint inhibitors using dynamic biomarker-overall survival models.

Bruno R, Chanu P, Kagedal M, Mercier F, Yoshida K, Guedj J Br J Cancer. 2023; 129(9):1383-1388.

PMID: 36765177 PMC: 10628227. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02190-5.


Making In Vitro Tumor Models Whole Again.

Wu K, Adine C, Mitriashkin A, Aw B, Iyer N, Fong E Adv Healthc Mater. 2023; 12(14):e2202279.

PMID: 36718949 PMC: 11469124. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202202279.

References
1.
Bergerot P, Hahn A, Bergerot C, Jones J, Pal S . The Role of Circulating Tumor DNA in Renal Cell Carcinoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2018; 19(2):10. DOI: 10.1007/s11864-018-0530-4. View

2.
. Increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy by more frequent administration or sequential scheduling: a patient-level meta-analysis of 37 298 women with early breast cancer in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2019; 393(10179):1440-1452. PMC: 6451189. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33137-4. View

3.
Dawson S, Tsui D, Murtaza M, Biggs H, Rueda O, Chin S . Analysis of circulating tumor DNA to monitor metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(13):1199-209. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1213261. View

4.
Zhou J, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Li Q, Cao Y . Modeling Tumor Evolutionary Dynamics to Predict Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis. Cancer Res. 2019; 80(3):591-601. PMC: 7002273. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-1940. View

5.
Basanta D, Gatenby R, Anderson A . Exploiting evolution to treat drug resistance: combination therapy and the double bind. Mol Pharm. 2012; 9(4):914-21. PMC: 3325107. DOI: 10.1021/mp200458e. View