» Articles » PMID: 35261053

Bayesian Models for Aggregate and Individual Patient Data Component Network Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Stat Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Mar 9
PMID 35261053
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Network meta-analysis can synthesize evidence from studies comparing multiple treatments for the same disease. Sometimes the treatments of a network are complex interventions, comprising several independent components in different combinations. A component network meta-analysis (CNMA) can be used to analyze such data and can in principle disentangle the individual effect of each component. However, components may interact with each other, either synergistically or antagonistically. Deciding which interactions, if any, to include in a CNMA model may be difficult, especially for large networks with many components. In this article, we present two Bayesian CNMA models that can be used to identify prominent interactions between components. Our models utilize Bayesian variable selection methods, namely the stochastic search variable selection and the Bayesian LASSO, and can benefit from the inclusion of prior information about important interactions. Moreover, we extend these models to combine data from studies providing aggregate information and studies providing individual patient data (IPD). We illustrate our models in practice using three real datasets, from studies in panic disorder, depression, and multiple myeloma. Finally, we describe methods for developing web-applications that can utilize results from an IPD-CNMA, to allow for personalized estimates of relative treatment effects given a patient's characteristics.

Citing Articles

Improving the adoption of a school-based nutrition program: findings from a collaborative network of randomised trials.

Barnes C, Sutherland R, Janssen L, Jones J, Robertson K, Gowland-Ella J Implement Sci. 2025; 20(1):5.

PMID: 39819778 PMC: 11740436. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-025-01417-8.


A Complex Meta-Regression Model to Identify Effective Features of Interventions From Multi-Arm, Multi-Follow-Up Trials.

Davies A, Higgins J Stat Med. 2024; 43(27):5217-5233.

PMID: 39382107 PMC: 11583959. DOI: 10.1002/sim.10237.


Model selection for component network meta-analysis in connected and disconnected networks: a simulation study.

Petropoulou M, Rucker G, Weibel S, Kranke P, Schwarzer G BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023; 23(1):140.

PMID: 37316775 PMC: 10268445. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-01959-9.


Four 2×2 factorial trials of smartphone CBT to reduce subthreshold depression and to prevent new depressive episodes among adults in the community-RESiLIENT trial (Resilience Enhancement with Smartphone in LIving ENvironmenTs): a master protocol.

Furukawa T, Tajika A, Sakata M, Luo Y, Toyomoto R, Horikoshi M BMJ Open. 2023; 13(2):e067850.

PMID: 36828653 PMC: 9972419. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067850.


Comparative effectiveness of oral antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in the prevention of postoperative infections in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: A network meta-analysis.

Xu L, Song M, Jiang Y, Li X Int Wound J. 2022; 20(2):567-578.

PMID: 35801293 PMC: 9885451. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13888.


References
1.
Furukawa T, Suganuma A, Ostinelli E, Andersson G, Beevers C, Shumake J . Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021; 8(6):500-511. PMC: 8838916. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00077-8. View

2.
Debray T, Moons K, Abo-Zaid G, Koffijberg H, Riley R . Individual participant data meta-analysis for a binary outcome: one-stage or two-stage?. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e60650. PMC: 3621872. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060650. View

3.
Steyerberg E, Eijkemans M, Habbema J . Stepwise selection in small data sets: a simulation study of bias in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999; 52(10):935-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00103-1. View

4.
Debray T, Schuit E, Efthimiou O, Reitsma J, Ioannidis J, Salanti G . An overview of methods for network meta-analysis using individual participant data: when do benefits arise?. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016; 27(5):1351-1364. DOI: 10.1177/0962280216660741. View

5.
Salanti G . Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool. Res Synth Methods. 2015; 3(2):80-97. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1037. View