» Articles » PMID: 35260991

Recommendations for Determining the Validity of Consumer Wearables and Smartphones for the Estimation of Energy Expenditure: Expert Statement and Checklist of the INTERLIVE Network

Abstract

Background: Consumer wearables and smartphone devices commonly offer an estimate of energy expenditure (EE) to assist in the objective monitoring of physical activity to the general population. Alongside consumers, healthcare professionals and researchers are seeking to utilise these devices for the monitoring of training and improving human health. However, the methods of validation and reporting of EE estimation in these devices lacks rigour, negatively impacting on the ability to make comparisons between devices and provide transparent accuracy.

Objectives: The Towards Intelligent Health and Well-Being Network of Physical Activity Assessment (INTERLIVE) is a joint European initiative of six universities and one industrial partner. The network was founded in 2019 and strives towards developing best-practice recommendations for evaluating the validity of consumer wearables and smartphones. This expert statement presents a best-practice validation protocol for consumer wearables and smartphones in the estimation of EE.

Methods: The recommendations were developed through (1) a systematic literature review; (2) an unstructured review of the wider literature discussing the potential factors that may introduce bias during validation studies; and (3) evidence-informed expert opinions from members of the INTERLIVE network.

Results: The systematic literature review process identified 1645 potential articles, of which 62 were deemed eligible for the final dataset. Based on these studies and the wider literature search, a validation framework is proposed encompassing six key domains for validation: the target population, criterion measure, index measure, testing conditions, data processing and the statistical analysis.

Conclusions: The INTERLIVE network recommends that the proposed protocol, and checklists provided, are used to standardise the testing and reporting of the validation of any consumer wearable or smartphone device to estimate EE. This in turn will maximise the potential utility of these technologies for clinicians, researchers, consumers, and manufacturers/developers, while ensuring transparency, comparability, and replicability in validation.

Trial Registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD42021223508.

Citing Articles

Using Free-Living Heart Rate Data as an Objective Method to Assess Physical Activity: A Scoping Review and Recommendations by the INTERLIVE-Network Targeting Consumer Wearables.

Schumann M, Feuerbacher J, Heinrich L, Olvera-Rojas M, Sclafani A, Brond J Sports Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39893599 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-024-02159-1.


Accuracy of the Huawei GT2 Smartwatch for Measuring Physical Activity and Sleep Among Adults During Daily Life: Instrument Validation Study.

Mei L, He Z, Hu L JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e59521.

PMID: 39727144 PMC: 11683742. DOI: 10.2196/59521.


The wearable landscape: Issues pertaining to the validation of the measurement of 24-h physical activity, sedentary, and sleep behavior assessment.

Giurgiu M, von Haaren-Mack B, Fiedler J, Woll S, Burchartz A, Kolb S J Sport Health Sci. 2024; 14:101006.

PMID: 39491744 PMC: 11809201. DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2024.101006.


Composite activity type and stride-specific energy expenditure estimation model for thigh-worn accelerometry.

Lendt C, Hansen N, Frobose I, Stewart T Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024; 21(1):99.

PMID: 39256837 PMC: 11389320. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01646-y.


Keeping Pace with Wearables: A Living Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews Evaluating the Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Technologies in Health Measurement.

Doherty C, Baldwin M, Keogh A, Caulfield B, Argent R Sports Med. 2024; 54(11):2907-2926.

PMID: 39080098 PMC: 11560992. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-024-02077-2.


References
1.
Bunn J, Navalta J, Fountaine C, Reece J . Current State of Commercial Wearable Technology in Physical Activity Monitoring 2015-2017. Int J Exerc Sci. 2018; 11(7):503-515. PMC: 5841672. DOI: 10.70252/NJQX2719. View

2.
WEIR J . New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol. 1949; 109(1-2):1-9. PMC: 1392602. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1949.sp004363. View

3.
Levine J . Measurement of energy expenditure. Public Health Nutr. 2005; 8(7A):1123-32. DOI: 10.1079/phn2005800. View

4.
Hills A, Mokhtar N, Byrne N . Assessment of physical activity and energy expenditure: an overview of objective measures. Front Nutr. 2015; 1:5. PMC: 4428382. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2014.00005. View

5.
Schoeller D, van Santen E . Measurement of energy expenditure in humans by doubly labeled water method. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982; 53(4):955-9. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1982.53.4.955. View