» Articles » PMID: 35251372

Integrated Analysis of DNA Repair Genes Identifies SLC6A1 As a New Marker for the Clinical Outcome of Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Journal Dis Markers
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2022 Mar 7
PMID 35251372
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains an important malignancy worldwide with poor prognosis. It has been known that DNA repair genes are involved in the development and progression of various tumors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore DNA repair gene-based prognostic biomarkers for CRC. In this study, the expressing pattern and prognostic values of DNA repair genes in CRC patients were analyzed using TCGA database. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were conducted to clarify the functional roles of dysregulated genes. We observed 358 differentially expressed DNA repair genes in CRC specimens, including 84 downregulated genes and 275 upregulated genes. 36 survival-related DNA repair genes were correlated with CRC patients' five-year survival, including 6 low-risk genes and 30 high-risk genes. Among the 10 overlapping genes, we focused on SLC6A1 which was highly expressed in CRC, and multivariate analysis confirmed that SLC6A1 expression as well as age and clinical stage could be regarded as an independent predicting factor for CRC prognosis. KEGG assays revealed that SLC6A1 may influence the clinical progression via regulating TGF-beta and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways. In addition, we observed that SLC6A1 was negatively regulated by SLC6A1 methylation, leading to its low expression in CRC specimens. Overall, SLC6A1 is upexpressed in CRC and can be used as a marker of poor prognosis in CRC patients.

Citing Articles

Retracted: Integrated Analysis of DNA Repair Genes Identifies SLC6A1 as a New Marker for the Clinical Outcome of Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Markers D Dis Markers. 2023; 2023:9874383.

PMID: 37538096 PMC: 10396570. DOI: 10.1155/2023/9874383.


Development and validation of a prognostic model for mitophagy-related genes in colon adenocarcinoma: A study based on TCGA and GEO databases.

Tang Y, Guo H, Chen L, Wang X, Chen Q, Gou L PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0284089.

PMID: 37023088 PMC: 10079075. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284089.


A novel risk score model based on gamma-aminobutyric acid signature predicts the survival prognosis of patients with breast cancer.

Yang L, Zhu J, Wang L, He L, Gong Y, Luo Q Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1108823.

PMID: 36969015 PMC: 10031029. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1108823.


A draft conceptual model of SLC6A1 neurodevelopmental disorder.

Goodspeed K, Mosca L, Weitzel N, Horning K, Simon E, Pfalzer A Front Neurosci. 2023; 16:1026065.

PMID: 36741059 PMC: 9893116. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1026065.

References
1.
Furtado C, Luciano M, da Silva Santos R, Furtado G, Moraes M, Pessoa C . Epidrugs: targeting epigenetic marks in cancer treatment. Epigenetics. 2019; 14(12):1164-1176. PMC: 6791710. DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2019.1640546. View

2.
Meng H, Cao Y, Qin J, Song X, Zhang Q, Shi Y . DNA methylation, its mediators and genome integrity. Int J Biol Sci. 2015; 11(5):604-17. PMC: 4400391. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.11218. View

3.
Yu G, Wang L, Han Y, He Q . clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012; 16(5):284-7. PMC: 3339379. DOI: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118. View

4.
Ritchie M, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law C, Shi W . limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(7):e47. PMC: 4402510. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. View

5.
Kishore C, Bhadra P . Current advancements and future perspectives of immunotherapy in colorectal cancer research. Eur J Pharmacol. 2020; 893:173819. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173819. View