» Articles » PMID: 35249238

Minimum Requirements in Emergency Kits for Bailout Strategies in TAVR Complications

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The proportion of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis treated by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasing, driven by favorable outcomes from randomized trials and current valve guidelines recommendations. Despite device and technique improvements having reduced procedural morbidities, complications during or immediately after TAVR still carries significant mortality risk.

Methods: We propose a check-list of essential items to anticipate potentially life-threatening complications in TAVR.

Results: Purpose of this review is to discuss the most common life-threatening complications during TAVR from a troubleshooting perspective, depicting the minimum required equipment needed in emergency situations.

Conclusions: Prevention of complications remains the most important strategy to optimize outcomes in TAVR procedures. Each specialized Center should institute and make easily accessible standardized emergency kits for the most common life-threatening conditions during TAVR that should be readily available in the cath-lab or hybrid operating room.

Citing Articles

Minimum requirements in emergency kits for bailout strategies in TAVR complications.

Gennari M, Tang G, Taramasso M, Russo G, Haager P, Barbanti M J Card Surg. 2022; 37(7):2053-2059.

PMID: 35249238 PMC: 9311222. DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16380.

References
1.
Hodson R, Jin R, Ring M, Gafoor S, Verburg S, Lehr E . Intrathoracic complications associated with trans-femoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Implications for emergency surgical preparedness. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 96(3):E369-E376. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28620. View

2.
Jabbour R, Tanaka A, Finkelstein A, Mack M, Tamburino C, van Mieghem N . Delayed Coronary Obstruction After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 71(14):1513-1524. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.066. View

3.
Elbadawi A, Saad M, Elgendy I, Barssoum K, Omer M, Soliman A . Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 12(18):1811-1822. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.037. View

4.
B Ribeiro H, Webb J, Makkar R, Cohen M, Kapadia S, Kodali S . Predictive factors, management, and clinical outcomes of coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from a large multicenter registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62(17):1552-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.040. View

5.
Zia S, Singh K, Juneja A, Schor J, Deitch J . Safety and Feasibility of Transradial Access for Noncoronary and Peripheral Vascular Interventions. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018; 53:255-261. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.04.003. View