» Articles » PMID: 3524634

Non-invasive Assessment by Doppler Ultrasound of 155 Patients with Bioprosthetic Valves: a Comparison of the Wessex Porcine, Low Profile Ionescu-Shiley, and Hancock Pericardial Bioprostheses

Overview
Journal Br Heart J
Date 1986 Jul 1
PMID 3524634
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One hundred and fifty five patients with 167 bioprosthetic valves (68 Wessex porcine, 54 Hancock pericardial, and 45 low profile Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valves) were studied by Doppler ultrasound. Valve gradients were calculated from the mitral and aortic flow velocities by the modified Bernoulli equation. Mean mitral gradients were significantly smaller across the Ionescu-Shiley valves than across the Wessex porcine or Hancock pericardial valves. Mitral pressure half time was, however, significantly longer in the Hancock pericardial than in the Wessex porcine or Ionescu-Shiley valves. No significant differences were seen among the groups of aortic bioprostheses, though the comparable size of Wessex porcine valves showed significantly higher gradients. Bioprosthetic regurgitation was detected in 13 of 103 mitral and 11 of 59 aortic valves, though it was suspected clinically in only 12 mitral and six aortic bioprostheses. Doppler ultrasound is a repeatable non-invasive method of acquiring haemodynamic information in vivo from a variety of bioprostheses and it can detect bioprosthetic regurgitation at an early stage.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic evaluation of left-sided prosthetic heart valve dysfunction.

Habets J, Budde R, Symersky P, van den Brink R, de Mol B, Mali W Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011; 8(8):466-78.

PMID: 21587215 DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.71.


How to quantitate valve regurgitation by echo Doppler techniques. British Society of Echocardiography.

Simpson I, de Belder M, Kenny A, Martin M, Nihoyannopoulos P Br Heart J. 1995; 73(5 Suppl 2):1-9.

PMID: 7612391 PMC: 483890. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.73.5_suppl_2.1.


Effect of changes in heart rate on pressure half time in normally functioning mitral valve prostheses.

Chambers J, McLoughlin N, Rapson A, Jackson G Br Heart J. 1988; 60(6):502-6.

PMID: 3224053 PMC: 1224891. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.60.6.502.


Assessment of normal and abnormal prosthetic mitral valves by Doppler echocardiography. Doppler in prosthetic mitral valves.

Habib G, Benichou M, Bonnet J, Jau P, Bille J, Djiane P Int J Card Imaging. 1990; 6(1):11-21.

PMID: 2286769 DOI: 10.1007/BF01798428.


Limitations of Doppler ultrasound in the assessment of the function of prosthetic mitral valves.

Chambers J, Jackson G, Jewitt D Br Heart J. 1990; 63(3):189-94.

PMID: 2183860 PMC: 1024405. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.63.3.189.

References
1.
Holen J, Aaslid R, Landmark K, Simonsen S . Determination of pressure gradient in mitral stenosis with a non-invasive ultrasound Doppler technique. Acta Med Scand. 1976; 199(6):455-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1976.tb06763.x. View

2.
Williams G, Labovitz A . Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valves. Am J Cardiol. 1985; 56(4):325-32. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90858-6. View

3.
Holen J, Hie J, Semb B . Obstructic characteristics of Björk-Shiley, Hancock, and Lillehei-Kaster prosthetic mitral valves in the immediate postoperative period. Acta Med Scand. 1978; 204(1-2):5-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1978.tb08389.x. View

4.
Holen J, Simonsen S, FROYSAKER T . An ultrasound Doppler technique for the noninvasive determination of the pressure gradient in the Björk-Shiley mitral valve. Circulation. 1979; 59(3):436-42. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.59.3.436. View

5.
Holen J, Simonsen S . Determination of pressure gradient in mitral stenosis with Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J. 1979; 41(5):529-35. PMC: 482066. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.41.5.529. View