Development of Intraoperative Assessment of Margins in Breast Conserving Surgery: a Narrative Review

Overview

Journal Gland Surg

Publisher AME Publishing Company

Specialty Endocrinology

Date 2022 Mar 4

PMID 35242687

Authors

Wanheng Li

Xiru Li

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: We intend to provide an informative and up-to-date summary on the topic of intraoperative assessment of margins in breast conserving surgery (BCS). Conventional methods as well as cutting-edge technologies are analyzed for their advantages and limitations in the hope that clinicians can turn to this for reference. This review can also offer guidance for technicians in the future design of intraoperative margin assessment tools.

Background: Achieving negative margins during BCS is one of the vital factors for preventing local recurrence. Conducting intraoperative margin assessment can ensure negative margins to a large extent and possibly relieve patients of the anguish of re-interventions. In recent years, innovative methods for margin assessment during BCS are advancing rapidly. And there is a lack of summary regarding the development of intraoperative margin assessment in BCS.

Methods: A PubMed search with keywords "intraoperative margin assessment" and "breast conserving surgery" was conducted. Relevant publications were screened manually for its title, abstract and even full text to determine its true relevance. Publications on neo-adjuvant therapy and intraoperative radiotherapy were excluded. References from the searched articles and other supplementary articles were also looked into.

Conclusions: Conventional methods for margin assessment yields stable outcome but its use is limited because of the demand on pathology staff and the trade-off between time and precision. Conventional imaging techniques pass the workload to radiologists at the cost of a significantly low duration of time. Involving artificial intelligence for image-based assessment is a further improvement. However, conventional imaging is inherently flawed in that occult lesions can't show on the image and the showing ones are ambiguous and open to interpretation. Unconventional techniques which base their judgment on cellular composition are more reassuring. Nonetheless, unconventional techniques should be subjected to clinical trials before putting into practice. And studies regarding comparison between conventional methods and unconventional methods are also needed to evaluate their relative efficacy.

Citing Articles

Clinical evaluation of breast cancer tissue with optical coherence tomography: key findings from a large-scale study.

Liu X, Cui M, Feng C, Jin S, Han X, Wu Y J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2025; 151(2):83.

PMID: 39948165 PMC: 11825538. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-025-06125-w.

Intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole breast radiotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: a retrospective outcome analysis based on ASTRO guidelines on PBI.

Gao S, Lin T, Liu L, Chen W, Liang J Breast Cancer Res. 2024; 26(1):181.

PMID: 39695713 PMC: 11657178. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01936-0.

Adherence to Quality Indicators for Breast Cancer Management in a Multidisciplinary Training Program.

Bau M, Borella F, Mano M, Giordano L, Carosso M, Surace A J Pers Med. 2023; 13(12).

PMID: 38138920 PMC: 10744846. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13121693.

Effectiveness of Carbon Localization for Invasive Breast Cancer: An Institutional Experience.

El-Helou E, Eddy C, Picchia S, Van de Merckt C, Radermeker M, Moreau M Breast J. 2023; 2023:4082501.

PMID: 37496746 PMC: 10368511. DOI: 10.1155/2023/4082501.

Specimen mammography for intraoperative margin assessment in breast conserving surgery: a meta-analysis.

Lin C, Wang K, Chen H, Xu Y, Pan T, Chen Y Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):18440.

PMID: 36323863 PMC: 9630505. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23234-5.

References

Tang R, Saksena M, Coopey S, Fernandez L, Buckley J, Lei L . Intraoperative micro-computed tomography (micro-CT): a novel method for determination of primary tumour dimensions in breast cancer specimens. Br J Radiol. 2015; 89(1058):20150581. PMC: 4985207. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150581. View

Padhani A, Liu G, Koh D, Chenevert T, Thoeny H, Takahara T . Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia. 2009; 11(2):102-25. PMC: 2631136. DOI: 10.1593/neo.81328. View

Wong T, Zhang R, Hai P, Zhang C, Pleitez M, Aft R . Fast label-free multilayered histology-like imaging of human breast cancer by photoacoustic microscopy. Sci Adv. 2017; 3(5):e1602168. PMC: 5435415. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1602168. View

Allen W, Chin L, Wijesinghe P, Kirk R, Latham B, Sampson D . Wide-field optical coherence micro-elastography for intraoperative assessment of human breast cancer margins. Biomed Opt Express. 2016; 7(10):4139-4153. PMC: 5102536. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.7.004139. View

Mojahed D, Ha R, Chang P, Gan Y, Yao X, Angelini B . Fully Automated Postlumpectomy Breast Margin Assessment Utilizing Convolutional Neural Network Based Optical Coherence Tomography Image Classification Method. Acad Radiol. 2019; 27(5):e81-e86. PMC: 7456393. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.06.018. View

Pataky R, Baliski C . Reoperation costs in attempted breast-conserving surgery: a decision analysis. Curr Oncol. 2016; 23(5):314-321. PMC: 5081007. DOI: 10.3747/co.23.2989. View

Koya S, Brusatori M, Yurgelevic S, Huang C, Werner C, Kast R . Accurate identification of breast cancer margins in microenvironments of ex-vivo basal and luminal breast cancer tissues using Raman spectroscopy. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2020; 151:106475. DOI: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2020.106475. View

Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A . Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(16):1227-32. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa020989. View

Obara R, Kamiya M, Tanaka Y, Abe A, Kojima R, Kawaguchi T . γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT)-Activatable Fluorescence Probe for Durable Tumor Imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020; 60(4):2125-2129. DOI: 10.1002/anie.202013265. View

10.

Sebastian M, Akbari S, Anglin B, Lin E, Police A . The impact of use of an intraoperative margin assessment device on re-excision rates. Springerplus. 2015; 4:198. PMC: 4441646. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-0801-5. View

11.

Darby S, McGale P, Correa C, Taylor C, Arriagada R, Clarke M . Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011; 378(9804):1707-16. PMC: 3254252. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61629-2. View

12.

Bathla L, Harris A, Davey M, Sharma P, Silva E . High resolution intra-operative two-dimensional specimen mammography and its impact on second operation for re-excision of positive margins at final pathology after breast conservation surgery. Am J Surg. 2011; 202(4):387-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.031. View

13.

Mamtani A, Zabor E, Rosenberger L, Stempel M, Gemignani M, Morrow M . Was Reexcision Less Frequent for Patients with Lobular Breast Cancer After Publication of the SSO-ASTRO Margin Guidelines?. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019; 26(12):3856-3862. PMC: 6788977. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07751-8. View

14.

SMITH L, Henry-Tillman R, Rubio I, Korourian S, Klimberg V . Intraoperative localization after stereotactic breast biopsy without a needle. Am J Surg. 2002; 182(6):584-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00790-5. View

15.

Wilson K, Bachawal S, Willmann J . Intraoperative Resection Guidance with Photoacoustic and Fluorescence Molecular Imaging Using an Anti-B7-H3 Antibody-Indocyanine Green Dual Contrast Agent. Clin Cancer Res. 2018; 24(15):3572-3582. PMC: 6102723. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0417. View

16.

Funk A, Heil J, Harcos A, Gomez C, Stieber A, Junkermann H . Efficacy of intraoperative specimen radiography as margin assessment tool in breast conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019; 179(2):425-433. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05476-6. View

17.

Langhans L, Jensen M, Talman M, Vejborg I, Kroman N, Tvedskov T . Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2016; 152(4):378-384. PMC: 5470426. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4751. View

18.

Osako T, Nishimura R, Nishiyama Y, Okumura Y, Tashima R, Nakano M . Efficacy of intraoperative entire-circumferential frozen section analysis of lumpectomy margins during breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2015; 20(6):1093-101. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-015-0827-2. View

19.

Poggi M, Danforth D, Sciuto L, Smith S, Steinberg S, Liewehr D . Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial. Cancer. 2003; 98(4):697-702. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11580. View

20.

Grootendorst M, Cariati M, Pinder S, Kothari A, Douek M, Kovacs T . Intraoperative Assessment of Tumor Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery Using F-FDG Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging: A First-in-Human Feasibility Study. J Nucl Med. 2016; 58(6):891-898. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.181032. View