» Articles » PMID: 25855313

Efficacy of Intraoperative Entire-circumferential Frozen Section Analysis of Lumpectomy Margins During Breast-conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 Apr 10
PMID 25855313
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Intraoperative frozen section analysis of the surgical margins during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer can reliably achieve clear surgical margins and prevent re-operations. The aim of this study was to assess intraoperative entire-circumferential frozen section analysis (IEFSA) of the lumpectomy margins during BCS.

Methods: A total of 1029 patients who underwent BCS with IEFSA between June 2007 and July 2013 were available for assessment. The inner surfaces of the shaved lumpectomy margins were examined as frozen sections during BCS. The margins were defined as positive when the cancer cells were present within 5 mm from the edge of the outermost margins of the specimens.

Results: Out of 1029 patients, 312 patients (30.3 %) had positive margins after the initial lumpectomy and underwent additional resections during BCS. Fourteen patients (1.4 %) underwent mastectomy following the results of additional resections during the first surgery. Of 1015 patients who completed BCS, 60 patients (5.9 %) were found to have positive margins in the final pathology. One patient (0.1 %) underwent re-operation after BCS while the residual diseases of the other 59 patients were judged to be minimal. Of the 312 patients who were judged to have positive margins after the initial lumpectomy with IEFSA, 53 patients (16.9 %) were found to have negative margins in the final pathology. At a median follow-up time of 54.1 months, one patient (0.1 %) had a recurrence of breast cancer in the preserved breast.

Conclusion: IEFSA is useful for preventing the need for re-operation and local recurrence after BCS.

Citing Articles

The potential of indocyanine green fluorescence detection in surgical cut margin of breast conserving surgery.

Yu H, Yao Y, Zhu T, Sun Y, Zhang M, Zhang Y Gland Surg. 2024; 13(6):1031-1044.

PMID: 39015719 PMC: 11247585. DOI: 10.21037/gs-24-195.


A human serum albumin-indocyanine green complex offers improved tumor identification in fluorescence-guided surgery.

Li Y, Dai C, Hua Z, Xia L, Ding Y, Wang Q Transl Cancer Res. 2024; 13(1):437-452.

PMID: 38410209 PMC: 10894326. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-2338.


Cost-Efficacy Analysis of Use of Frozen Section Histology for Margin Assessment During Breast Conservation Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients.

Agarwal G, Sattavan S, Chanthar K, Kumar A, Sabaretnam M, Chand G World J Surg. 2023; 47(10):2457-2463.

PMID: 37386245 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07094-2.


Radiopaque tissue transfer and X-ray system versus standard specimen radiography for intraoperative margin assessment in breast-conserving surgery: randomized clinical trial.

Stachs A, Bollmann J, Martin A, Stubert J, Reimer T, Gerber B BJS Open. 2022; 6(4).

PMID: 35946449 PMC: 9364380. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac091.


Evolution of Frozen Section in Carcinoma Breast: Systematic Review.

Rana M, Rana A, Sharma U, Barwal T, Jain A Int J Breast Cancer. 2022; 2022:4958580.

PMID: 35655582 PMC: 9152418. DOI: 10.1155/2022/4958580.


References
1.
Jacobson A, Asad J, Boolbol S, Osborne M, Boachie-Adjei K, Feldman S . Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?. Am J Surg. 2008; 196(4):556-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.007. View

2.
Kokubo M, Mitsumori M, Ishikura S, Nagata Y, Fujishiro S, Inamoto T . Results of breast-conserving therapy for early stage breast cancer: Kyoto University experiences. Am J Clin Oncol. 2000; 23(5):499-505. DOI: 10.1097/00000421-200010000-00014. View

3.
Camp E, McAuliffe P, Gilroy J, Morris C, Lind D, Mendenhall N . Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance. J Am Coll Surg. 2005; 201(6):855-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.06.274. View

4.
Jacobson J, DANFORTH D, Cowan K, DAngelo T, Steinberg S, Pierce L . Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995; 332(14):907-11. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199504063321402. View

5.
Obedian E, Haffty B . Internal mammary nodal irradiation in conservatively-managed breast cancer patients: is there a benefit?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999; 44(5):997-1003. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00135-2. View