» Articles » PMID: 35238584

Expertise in Emotion: A Scoping Review and Unifying Framework for Individual Differences in the Mental Representation of Emotional Experience

Overview
Journal Psychol Bull
Specialty Psychology
Date 2022 Mar 3
PMID 35238584
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Expertise refers to outstanding skill or ability in a particular domain. In the domain of emotion, expertise refers to the observation that some people are better at a range of competencies related to understanding and experiencing emotions, and these competencies may help them lead healthier lives. These individual differences are represented by multiple constructs including emotional awareness, emotional clarity, emotional complexity, emotional granularity, and emotional intelligence. These constructs derive from different theoretical perspectives, highlight different competencies, and are operationalized and measured in different ways. The full set of relationships between these constructs has not yet been considered, hindering scientific progress and the translation of findings to aid mental and physical well-being. In this article, we use a scoping review procedure to integrate these constructs within a shared conceptual space. Scoping reviews provide a principled means of synthesizing large and diverse literature in a transparent fashion, enabling the identification of similarities as well as gaps and inconsistencies across constructs. Using domain-general accounts of expertise as a guide, we build a unifying framework for expertise in emotion and apply this to constructs that describe how people understand and experience their own emotions. Our approach offers opportunities to identify potential mechanisms of expertise in emotion, encouraging future research on those mechanisms and on educational or clinical interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Animal emotions and consciousness: a preliminary assessment of researchers' perceptions and biases and prospects for future progress.

Zipple M, Hazelwood C, Webster M, Benitez M R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(11):241255.

PMID: 39539500 PMC: 11558068. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.241255.


More than labels: neural representations of emotion words are widely distributed across the brain.

Lee K, Satpute A Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024; 19(1).

PMID: 38903026 PMC: 11259136. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsae043.


Ability-Related Emotional Intelligence: An Introduction.

Robinson M J Intell. 2024; 12(5).

PMID: 38786653 PMC: 11121825. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence12050051.


Mechanistic studies in pathological health anxiety: A systematic review and emerging conceptual framework.

Guthrie A, Paredes-Echeverri S, Bleier C, Adams C, Millstein D, Ranford J J Affect Disord. 2024; 358:222-249.

PMID: 38718945 PMC: 11298870. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.029.


Difficulties in emotion regulation and well-being in breast cancer.

Guimaraes I, Torres S, Vieira A, Jonsson C, Guerra M, Lencastre L Health Psychol Behav Med. 2024; 12(1):2329087.

PMID: 38510937 PMC: 10953782. DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2024.2329087.


References
1.
Ong A, Zautra A, Finan P . Inter- and Intra-Individual Variation in Emotional Complexity: Methodological Considerations and Theoretical Implications. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017; 15:22-26. PMC: 5679023. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.018. View

2.
Lesser I . A review of the alexithymia concept. Psychosom Med. 1981; 43(6):531-43. DOI: 10.1097/00006842-198112000-00009. View

3.
Pham M, Rajic A, Greig J, Sargeant J, Papadopoulos A, McEwen S . A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2015; 5(4):371-85. PMC: 4491356. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1123. View

4.
RUESCH J . The infantile personality. The core problem of psychosomatic medicine. Psychosom Med. 1948; 10(3):134-44. View

5.
Goldstone R . Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994; 123(2):178-200. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.123.2.178. View