» Articles » PMID: 35232380

Representations of Personalised Medicine in Family Medicine: a Qualitative Analysis

Overview
Journal BMC Prim Care
Date 2022 Mar 2
PMID 35232380
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The promise of personalised medicine (PM) to transform healthcare has sparked great enthusiasm in the last years. Yet, its lack of consensus around the nature and scope of the concept has ended in terminological confusion amongst the users in primary care. We aimed to investigate the perceptions of doctors and their patients in response to this evolving concept. This present article focuses on the general understanding of personalised medicine, underlining the confusion over the concept.

Methods: Semi-structured comprehensive interviews were conducted with 10 general practitioners (GPs) and 10 of their patients. The purposive sampling took into account the doctor's age, sex, and place of practice (rural/urban); each doctor recruited one patient of the same age and sex. Each interview began with the same open-ended question about the participant's knowledge of the topic, after which a working definition was provided to continue the discussion. Using the grounded theory method, the analysis consisted of open coding, axial coding and selective coding.

Results: From our present analysis focusing on the general understanding of PM, three main themes representing the concept emerged. The first two representations being "centred on the person as a whole" and "focused on alternative and complementary methods", in which the therapeutic relationship was stated as key. The third theme "medicine open to innovation" involved the few participants who had a good understanding of the concept and could associate personalised medicine with genomics. For those who value therapeutic relationship, the risks of accepting innovation could result in "fast-food" medicine and interpersonal barriers.

Discussion: PM is predominantly unfamiliar in family medicine. It is misinterpreted as a holistic or integrative type of medicine. This semantic confusion probably lies in the choice of the label "personalised" or from the lack of a uniform definition for the term.

Citing Articles

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of the Gastroenterology Department Patients Towards Chronic Gastritis in Shanxi Region: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Qin D, Wang L, Ni Y, Shan Z, Yang L Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024; 18:1769-1777.

PMID: 39188290 PMC: 11346479. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S463061.


Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Among Anesthesia and Thoracic Surgery Medical Staff Toward Ai-PCA.

Song Z, Cai J, Zhou Y, Jiang Y, Huang S, Gu L J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:3295-3304.

PMID: 39006875 PMC: 11246636. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S468539.


Precision Medicine-Are We There Yet? A Narrative Review of Precision Medicine's Applicability in Primary Care.

Evans W, Meslin E, Kai J, Qureshi N J Pers Med. 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38673045 PMC: 11051552. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14040418.


Patients' perspectives related to ethical issues and risks in precision medicine: a systematic review.

Ahmed L, Constantinidou A, Chatzittofis A Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1215663.

PMID: 37396896 PMC: 10310545. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1215663.


Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Personalised Medicine across Europe.

Stefanicka-Wojtas D, Kurpas D J Pers Med. 2023; 13(2).

PMID: 36836438 PMC: 9965772. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13020203.

References
1.
Vogt H, Green S, Ekstrom C, Brodersen J . How precision medicine and screening with big data could increase overdiagnosis. BMJ. 2019; 366:l5270. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l5270. View

2.
Cohidon C, Cardinaux R, Cornuz J, Chenal R, Desvergne B, Guessous I . May direct-to-consumer genetic testing have an impact on general practitioners' daily practice? a cross-sectional study of patients' intentions towards this approach. BMC Fam Pract. 2021; 22(1):79. PMC: 8077756. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01428-6. View

3.
Vassy J, Korf B, Green R . How to know when physicians are ready for genomic medicine. Sci Transl Med. 2015; 7(287):287fs19. PMC: 4519005. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa2401. View

4.
Skirton H, Jackson L, Goldsmith L, OConnor A . Are health professionals ready for direct-to-consumer genetic and genomic testing?. Per Med. 2018; 10(7):673-682. DOI: 10.2217/pme.13.71. View

5.
Vogt H, Ulvestad E, Eriksen T, Getz L . Getting personal: can systems medicine integrate scientific and humanistic conceptions of the patient?. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014; 20(6):942-52. DOI: 10.1111/jep.12251. View