Validity, Reliability, and Generalizability in Qualitative Research

Overview

Journal J Family Med Prim Care

Specialty Public Health

Date 2015 Aug 20

PMID 26288766

Citations 206

Authors

Lawrence Leung

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In general practice, qualitative research contributes as significantly as quantitative research, in particular regarding psycho-social aspects of patient-care, health services provision, policy setting, and health administrations. In contrast to quantitative research, qualitative research as a whole has been constantly critiqued, if not disparaged, by the lack of consensus for assessing its quality and robustness. This article illustrates with five published studies how qualitative research can impact and reshape the discipline of primary care, spiraling out from clinic-based health screening to community-based disease monitoring, evaluation of out-of-hours triage services to provincial psychiatric care pathways model and finally, national legislation of core measures for children's healthcare insurance. Fundamental concepts of validity, reliability, and generalizability as applicable to qualitative research are then addressed with an update on the current views and controversies.

Citing Articles

Quality of evidence in the oral health international data: Contributions for a global profile.

Queiroz Marques Dos Santos S, da Costa Oliveira A PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0315131.

PMID: 39937813 PMC: 11819551. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315131.

The Safety of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Findings and Recommendations From a Qualitative Study Exploring Users' Experiences, Concerns, and Suggestions.

Taher R, Stahl D, Shergill S, Yiend J JMIR Hum Factors. 2025; 12:e62974.

PMID: 39919292 PMC: 11845877. DOI: 10.2196/62974.

"I surely don't call for fun": experiences of being a "frequent caller" to the Danish emergency helpline.

Laursen C, Gehrt T, Huibers L, Bossen C, Vaeggemose U BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):365.

PMID: 39881305 PMC: 11776193. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21390-7.

Compliance with radiation protection among radiographers in Eswatini public health facilities.

Shungube A, Khoza T Health SA. 2025; 29():2727.

PMID: 39822897 PMC: 11736565. DOI: 10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2727.

Opening the digital doorway to sexual healthcare: Recommendations from a behaviour change wheel analysis of barriers and facilitators to seeking online sexual health information and support among underserved populations.

McLeod J, Estcourt C, MacDonald J, Gibbs J, Woode Owusu M, Mapp F PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0315049.

PMID: 39775372 PMC: 11709294. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315049.

References

Coyne I . Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?. J Adv Nurs. 1997; 26(3):623-30. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x. View

Williams V, Price J, Hardinge M, Tarassenko L, Farmer A . Using a mobile health application to support self-management in COPD: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2014; 64(624):e392-400. PMC: 4073724. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X680473. View

Zimmer L . Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. J Adv Nurs. 2006; 53(3):311-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03721.x. View

Khandaker G, Gandamaneni P, Dibben C, Cherukuru S, Cairns P, Ray M . Evaluating care pathways for community psychiatry in England: a qualitative study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012; 19(2):298-303. PMC: 4154123. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01822.x. View

Palinkas L, Horwitz S, Green C, Wisdom J, Duan N, Hoagwood K . Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2013; 42(5):533-44. PMC: 4012002. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y. View

Hess R, Santucci A, McTigue K, Fischer G, Kapoor W . Patient difficulty using tablet computers to screen in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23(4):476-80. PMC: 2359506. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0500-1. View

George M, Apter A . Gaining insight into patients' beliefs using qualitative research methodologies. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004; 4(3):185-9. DOI: 10.1097/00130832-200406000-00008. View

Waterman A . The humanistic psychology-positive psychology divide: contrasts in philosophical foundations. Am Psychol. 2013; 68(3):124-33. DOI: 10.1037/a0032168. View

Mangione-Smith R, Schiff J, Dougherty D . Identifying children's health care quality measures for Medicaid and CHIP: an evidence-informed, publicly transparent expert process. Acad Pediatr. 2011; 11(3 Suppl):S11-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.11.003. View

10.

Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, Bower P, Hirani S, Cartwright M . Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12:220. PMC: 3413558. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-220. View

11.

Porter S . Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. J Adv Nurs. 2007; 60(1):79-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04360.x. View

12.

Allmark P . Popper and nursing theory. Nurs Philos. 2003; 4(1):4-16. DOI: 10.1046/j.1466-769x.2003.00114.x. View

13.

Wackerbarth S, Tarasenko Y, Joyce J, Haist S . Physician colorectal cancer screening recommendations: an examination based on informed decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 66(1):43-50. PMC: 3635666. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.10.003. View

14.

Meyrick J . What is good qualitative research? A first step towards a comprehensive approach to judging rigour/quality. J Health Psychol. 2006; 11(5):799-808. DOI: 10.1177/1359105306066643. View

15.

Patton M . Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res. 1999; 34(5 Pt 2):1189-208. PMC: 1089059. View

16.

Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G . Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res. 1999; 8(3):341-51. DOI: 10.1177/104973239800800305. View

17.

Kitto S, Chesters J, Grbich C . Quality in qualitative research. Med J Aust. 2008; 188(4):243-6. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01595.x. View

18.

Barbour R . Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. BMJ. 2001; 322(7294):1115-7. PMC: 1120242. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115. View

19.

Grossoehme D . Overview of qualitative research. J Health Care Chaplain. 2014; 20(3):109-22. PMC: 4609437. DOI: 10.1080/08854726.2014.925660. View

20.

Sale J . How to assess rigour . . . or not in qualitative papers. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008; 14(5):912-3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01093.x. View