» Articles » PMID: 35223941

Cumulative Betel Quid Chewing and the Risk of Significant Liver Fibrosis in Subjects With and Without Metabolic Syndrome

Overview
Journal Front Nutr
Date 2022 Feb 28
PMID 35223941
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Betel quid chewing is associated with metabolic disorders, oral cancer, cardiovascular disease, and chronic liver diseases. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is also a factor associated with liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, studies on the relationship between betel quid and liver fibrosis while also considering MetS are lacking. The aim of this study was thus to investigate the association of betel quid chewing and liver fibrosis with MetS.

Methods: A total of 9,221 subjects were enrolled after excluding subjects <18 years of age, with past history of chronic liver diseases, cancer, significant alcohol consumption, and incomplete data. Betel nut chewing habit was classified into three groups: none, former-chewing, and current-chewing, and cumulative exposure was calculated by multiplying the duration with the quantity. Liver fibrosis was evaluated based on the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), which is a composite score of age, hyperglycemia, BMI, platelet count, albumin, and the AST/ALT ratio. Significant liver fibrosis was defined as NFS ≥-1.455.

Results: After adjusting for other variables, MetS was positively associated with significant liver fibrosis. Subjects with both MetS and betel quid chewing had a higher associated risk of significant liver fibrosis than those with neither MetS nor betel quid chewing (adjusted OR: 3.03, 95% CI: 2.04-4.50, < 0.001). Betel quid chewing was associated with significant liver fibrosis (adjusted OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.14-3.49, = 0.015) in subjects with MetS, but not in subjects without.

Conclusion: Metabolic syndrome increased the associated risk of significant liver fibrosis. Cumulative betel quid exposure increased the associated risk of significant liver fibrosis in subjects with MetS, but not in subjects without.

Citing Articles

Epidemiology of quid usage and its possible association with the occurrence of oral mucosal lesions.

Almalki S, Gowdar I, Vengal M, Arya S Front Oral Health. 2024; 5:1450729.

PMID: 39664881 PMC: 11631780. DOI: 10.3389/froh.2024.1450729.


Substance use and incidence of metabolic syndrome before midlife among military adults: the CHIEF cohort study.

Liu W, Hsu Y, Lin Y, Tsai K, Chang Y, Liu P Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1406524.

PMID: 38894993 PMC: 11184061. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1406524.


The Controversial Roles of Areca Nut: Medicine or Toxin?.

Liu P, Chang Y Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(10).

PMID: 37240342 PMC: 10219234. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24108996.


Gut metabolomics and 16S rRNA sequencing analysis of the effects of arecoline on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in rats.

Zhu L, Li D, Yang X Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1132026.

PMID: 37050898 PMC: 10083296. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1132026.


Tendon Disorders in Chronic Liver Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Taiwan.

Lin C, Huang S, Tzou S, Yin C, Chen J, Chen Y Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(6).

PMID: 36981892 PMC: 10049230. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20064983.

References
1.
Chu N . Prevalence of obesity in Taiwan. Obes Rev. 2005; 6(4):271-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00175.x. View

2.
Leclercq I, da Silva Morais A, Schroyen B, Van Hul N, Geerts A . Insulin resistance in hepatocytes and sinusoidal liver cells: mechanisms and consequences. J Hepatol. 2007; 47(1):142-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.04.002. View

3.
Chiang D, Pritchard M, Nagy L . Obesity, diabetes mellitus, and liver fibrosis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011; 300(5):G697-702. PMC: 3094133. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00426.2010. View

4.
Rinella M . Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015; 313(22):2263-73. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.5370. View

5.
Lonardo A, Ballestri S, Marchesini G, Angulo P, Loria P . Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a precursor of the metabolic syndrome. Dig Liver Dis. 2015; 47(3):181-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.09.020. View