» Articles » PMID: 35223216

Non-conventional Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Microbeam Radiotherapy Provides Superior Normal Tissue Sparing in Rat Lung Compared to Non-conventional Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2022 Feb 28
PMID 35223216
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conventional radiotherapy is a widely used non-invasive form of treatment for many types of cancer. However, due to a low threshold in the lung for radiation-induced normal tissue damage, it is of less utility in treating lung cancer. For this reason, surgery is the preferred treatment for lung cancer, which has the detriment of being highly invasive. Non-conventional ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy is currently of great interest in the radiotherapy community due to demonstrations of reduced normal tissue toxicity in lung and other anatomy. This study investigates the effects of FLASH microbeam radiotherapy, which in addition to ultra-high dose rate incorporates a spatial segmentation of the radiation field, on the normal lung tissue of rats. With a focus on fibrotic damage, this work demonstrates that FLASH microbeam radiotherapy provides an order of magnitude increase in normal tissue radio-resistance compared to FLASH radiotherapy. This result suggests FLASH microbeam radiotherapy holds promise for much improved non-invasive control of lung cancer.

Citing Articles

Ultra‑high dose rate (FLASH) treatment: A novel radiotherapy modality (Review).

Huang J, Cheng J, Shi B, Du X, Tang S, Lin B Mol Clin Oncol. 2025; 22(3):23.

PMID: 39885864 PMC: 11775888. DOI: 10.3892/mco.2025.2818.


Pushing the boundaries of radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations: highlights from the 7 immunorad conference.

Laurent P, Andre F, Bobard A, Deandreis D, Demaria S, Depil S Oncoimmunology. 2024; 14(1):2432726.

PMID: 39696783 PMC: 11660406. DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2024.2432726.


Effects of ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy with different fractions and dose rate on acute and chronic lung injury in mice.

Gao F, Lin B, Yang Y, Xiao D, Zhou Z, Zhang Y Heliyon. 2024; 10(22):e40298.

PMID: 39641017 PMC: 11617221. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40298.


A review of diamond dosimeters in advanced radiotherapy techniques.

Angelou C, Patallo I, Doherty D, Romano F, Schettino G Med Phys. 2024; 51(12):9230-9249.

PMID: 39221583 PMC: 11656300. DOI: 10.1002/mp.17370.


A readout system for highly sensitive diamond detectors for FLASH dosimetry.

Pettinato S, Felici G, Galluzzo L, Rossi M, Girolami M, Salvatori S Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 29:100538.

PMID: 38317851 PMC: 10839766. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100538.


References
1.
Coan P, Peterzol A, Fiedler S, Ponchut C, Labiche J, Bravin A . Evaluation of imaging performance of a taper optics CCD; FReLoN' camera designed for medical imaging. J Synchrotron Radiat. 2006; 13(Pt 3):260-70. DOI: 10.1107/S0909049506008983. View

2.
Favaudon V, Caplier L, Monceau V, Pouzoulet F, Sayarath M, Fouillade C . Ultrahigh dose-rate FLASH irradiation increases the differential response between normal and tumor tissue in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2014; 6(245):245ra93. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008973. View

3.
Serduc R, Verant P, Vial J, Farion R, Rocas L, Remy C . In vivo two-photon microscopy study of short-term effects of microbeam irradiation on normal mouse brain microvasculature. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 64(5):1519-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.11.047. View

4.
Debus C, Oelfke U, Bartzsch S . A point kernel algorithm for microbeam radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2017; 62(21):8341-8359. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa8d63. View

5.
Hubner R, Gitter W, Mokhtari N, Mathiak M, Both M, Bolte H . Standardized quantification of pulmonary fibrosis in histological samples. Biotechniques. 2008; 44(4):507-11, 514-7. DOI: 10.2144/000112729. View