» Articles » PMID: 35214833

In Vitro Technology in Plant Conservation: Relevance to Biocultural Diversity

Overview
Journal Plants (Basel)
Date 2022 Feb 26
PMID 35214833
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Plant diversity is critical to the functioning of human societies, and evidence shows that plant conservation success is driven by integrative approaches that include social and biological factors. Plants have a unique capacity to reproduce asexually, and propagation practices can yield large numbers of plantlets. These plantlets can be used in several ways to fulfil conservation goals including the repopulation of regions with declining densities of threatened species that hold cultural meaning. However, the potential of in vitro technologies in the conservation of plants that hold cultural meaning is understudied. In this paper we focus upon the roles of in vitro technologies in the conservation of plants relevant to biocultural environments and provide an overview of potential knowledge gaps at the interface of in vitro and plants used traditionally, including those meaningful to Indigenous Peoples. We conclude that in vitro technologies can be powerful tools in biocultural conservation if they are deployed in a manner respectful of the socio-cultural context in which plants play a role, but that further research is needed in this regard. We suggest several epistemological points to facilitate future research.

Citing Articles

In vitro micropropagation protocols for two endangered Dianthus species - via in vitro culture for conservation and recultivation purposes.

Farkas D, Csabai J, Kolesnyk A, Szarvas P, Dobranszki J Plant Methods. 2025; 21(1):13.

PMID: 39910557 PMC: 11796268. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-025-01335-2.


Influence of Primary Light Exposure on the Morphophysiological Characteristics and Phenolic Compounds Accumulation of a Tea Callus Culture ( L.).

Zubova M, Goncharuk E, Nechaeva T, Aksenova M, Zaitsev G, Katanskaya V Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(19).

PMID: 39408751 PMC: 11477156. DOI: 10.3390/ijms251910420.


In Vitro Germination and Organogenesis of Endangered Neo-Endemic Baltic Dunes Species Schweigg.

Banaszczyk L, Starke M, Szelbracikowski D, Scibior J, Kapusta M Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(17).

PMID: 39273945 PMC: 11397275. DOI: 10.3390/plants13172461.


In Vitro Collection for the Safe Storage of Grapevine Hybrids and Identification of the Presence of Resistance Genes.

Romadanova N, Aralbayeva M, Zemtsova A, Alexandrova A, Kazybayeva S, Mikhailenko N Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 38674499 PMC: 11053666. DOI: 10.3390/plants13081089.


Plants, Cells, Algae, and Cyanobacteria In Vitro and Cryobank Collections at the Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences-A Platform for Research and Production Center.

Yuorieva N, Sinetova M, Messineva E, Kulichenko I, Fomenkov A, Vysotskaya O Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(6).

PMID: 37372123 PMC: 10295647. DOI: 10.3390/biology12060838.


References
1.
Snaddon J, Petrokofsky G, Jepson P, Willis K . Biodiversity technologies: tools as change agents. Biol Lett. 2012; 9(1):20121029. PMC: 3565525. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.1029. View

2.
Kordyum E, Hasenstein K . Plant biology for space exploration - Building on the past, preparing for the future. Life Sci Space Res (Amst). 2021; 29:1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.lssr.2021.01.003. View

3.
Corlett R . A Bigger Toolbox: Biotechnology in Biodiversity Conservation. Trends Biotechnol. 2016; 35(1):55-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.06.009. View

4.
Larson G, Piperno D, Allaby R, Purugganan M, Andersson L, Arroyo-Kalin M . Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(17):6139-46. PMC: 4035915. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1323964111. View

5.
Lewis D, Williams L, Jones R . A radical revision of the public health response to environmental crisis in a warming world: contributions of Indigenous knowledges and Indigenous feminist perspectives. Can J Public Health. 2020; 111(6):897-900. PMC: 7728934. DOI: 10.17269/s41997-020-00388-1. View