» Articles » PMID: 35204538

Evaluation and Modelling of the Performance of an Automated SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Assay According to Sample Type, Target Population and Epidemic Trends

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Feb 25
PMID 35204538
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Lumipulse  SARS-CoV-2 Ag assay performance was evaluated on prospectively collected saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) of recently ill in- and outpatients and according to the estimated viral load. Performances were calculated using RT-PCR positive NPS from patients with symptoms ≤ 7 days and RT-PCR negative NPS as gold standard. In addition, non-selected positive NPS were analyzed to assess the performances on various viral loads. This assay yielded a sensitivity of 93.1% on NPS and 71.4% on saliva for recently ill patients. For NPS with a viral load > 10 RNA copies/mL, sensitivity was 96.4%. A model established on our daily routine showed fluctuations of the performances depending on the epidemic trends but an overall good negative predictive value. Lumipulse  SARS-CoV-2 assay yielded good performance for an automated antigen detection assay on NPS. Using it for the detection of recently ill patients or to screen high-risk patients could be an interesting alternative to the more expensive RT-PCR.

Citing Articles

The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Davenport C, Arevalo-Rodriguez I, Mateos-Haro M, Berhane S, Dinnes J, Spijker R Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 12:CD014780.

PMID: 39679851 PMC: 11648846. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.


The Detection of SARS-CoV2 Antigen in Wastewater Using an Automated Chemiluminescence Enzyme Immunoassay.

Thongpradit S, Prasongtanakij S, Srisala S, Chanprasertyothin S, Pasomsub E, Ongphiphadhanakul B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(13).

PMID: 35805441 PMC: 9265940. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137783.

References
1.
Burton J, Love H, Richards K, Burton C, Summers S, Pitman J . The effect of heat-treatment on SARS-CoV-2 viability and detection. J Virol Methods. 2021; 290:114087. PMC: 7840429. DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114087. View

2.
Lefever S, Indevuyst C, Cuypers L, Dewaele K, Yin N, Cotton F . Comparison of the Quantitative DiaSorin Liaison Antigen Test to Reverse Transcription-PCR for the Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Outpatients. J Clin Microbiol. 2021; 59(7):e0037421. PMC: 8218764. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00374-21. View

3.
Bordi L, Parisi G, Sberna G, Amendola A, Mariani B, Meoni G . Effective screening strategy against SARS-CoV-2 on self-collected saliva samples in primary school setting: A pilot project. J Infect. 2021; 83(1):e8-e10. PMC: 8139176. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.05.013. View

4.
Han P, Ivanovski S . Saliva-Friend and Foe in the COVID-19 Outbreak. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020; 10(5). PMC: 7277967. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10050290. View

5.
Williams E, Bond K, Zhang B, Putland M, Williamson D . Saliva as a Noninvasive Specimen for Detection of SARS-CoV-2. J Clin Microbiol. 2020; 58(8). PMC: 7383524. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00776-20. View