Nonequivalent After-Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Oscillation and Inhibition: Simulation and Experimental Study

Overview

Journal Brain Sci

Publisher MDPI

Date 2022 Feb 25

PMID 35203958

Authors

Makoto Suzuki

Satoshi Tanaka

Jose Gomez-Tames

Takuhiro Okabe

Kilchoon Cho

Naoki Iso

Akimasa Hirata

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) frequency on brain oscillations and cortical excitability are still controversial. Therefore, this study investigated how different tACS frequencies differentially modulate cortical oscillation and inhibition. To do so, we first determined the optimal positioning of tACS electrodes through an electric field simulation constructed from magnetic resonance images. Seven electrode configurations were tested on the electric field of the precentral gyrus (hand motor area). We determined that the Cz-CP1 configuration was optimal, as it resulted in higher electric field values and minimized the intra-individual differences in the electric field. Therefore, tACS was delivered to the hand motor area through this arrangement at a fixed frequency of 10 Hz (alpha-tACS) or 20 Hz (beta-tACS) with a peak-to-peak amplitude of 0.6 mA for 20 min. We found that alpha- and beta-tACS resulted in larger alpha and beta oscillations, respectively, compared with the oscillations observed after sham-tACS. In addition, alpha- and beta-tACS decreased the amplitudes of conditioned motor evoked potentials and increased alpha and beta activity, respectively. Correspondingly, alpha- and beta-tACSs enhanced cortical inhibition. These results show that tACS frequency differentially affects motor cortex oscillation and inhibition.

Citing Articles

Is transcranial alternating current stimulation effective for improving working memory? A three-level meta-analysis.

Zhang S, Cui X, Yu S, Li X Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; .

PMID: 39438426 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02595-0.

Beta tACS of varying intensities differentially affect resting-state and movement-related M1-M1 connectivity.

Wansbrough K, Marinovic W, Fujiyama H, Vallence A Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1425527.

PMID: 39371612 PMC: 11450697. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1425527.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation can modulate the blink reflex excitability. Effects of a 10- and 20-Hz tACS session on the blink reflex recovery cycle in healthy subjects.

Maccora S, Sardo P, Giglia G, Torrente A, Di Stefano V, Brighina F Neurol Sci. 2024; 46(1):401-409.

PMID: 39096396 PMC: 11698815. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07719-x.

Perspectives on Optimized Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Based on Spatial Electric Field Modeling in Humans.

Gomez-Tames J, Fernandez-Corazza M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38892794 PMC: 11172989. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113084.

Exploring the Prospects of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) as a Therapeutic Intervention for Post-Stroke Motor Recovery: A Narrative Review.

Meng H, Houston M, Zhang Y, Li S Brain Sci. 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38671974 PMC: 11047964. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14040322.

References

Pollok B, Boysen A, Krause V . The effect of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) at alpha and beta frequency on motor learning. Behav Brain Res. 2015; 293:234-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.07.049. View

Vossen A, Gross J, Thut G . Alpha Power Increase After Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at Alpha Frequency (α-tACS) Reflects Plastic Changes Rather Than Entrainment. Brain Stimul. 2015; 8(3):499-508. PMC: 4464304. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.12.004. View

Amadi U, Allman C, Johansen-Berg H, Stagg C . The Homeostatic Interaction Between Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Motor Learning in Humans is Related to GABAA Activity. Brain Stimul. 2015; 8(5):898-905. PMC: 4742653. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.04.010. View

Herrmann C, Rach S, Neuling T, Struber D . Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:279. PMC: 3682121. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00279. View

Chen D, Fetz E . Characteristic membrane potential trajectories in primate sensorimotor cortex neurons recorded in vivo. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 94(4):2713-25. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00024.2005. View

Cozac V, Gschwandtner U, Hatz F, Hardmeier M, Ruegg S, Fuhr P . Quantitative EEG and Cognitive Decline in Parkinson's Disease. Parkinsons Dis. 2016; 2016:9060649. PMC: 4842380. DOI: 10.1155/2016/9060649. View

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A . G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39(2):175-91. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193146. View

Sanger T, Garg R, Chen R . Interactions between two different inhibitory systems in the human motor cortex. J Physiol. 2001; 530(Pt 2):307-17. PMC: 2278414. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0307l.x. View

Latreille V, Carrier J, Gaudet-Fex B, Rodrigues-Brazete J, Panisset M, Chouinard S . Electroencephalographic prodromal markers of dementia across conscious states in Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2016; 139(Pt 4):1189-99. PMC: 5841211. DOI: 10.1093/brain/aww018. View

10.

Rjosk V, Kaminski E, Hoff M, Gundlach C, Villringer A, Sehm B . Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at Beta Frequency: Lack of Immediate Effects on Excitation and Interhemispheric Inhibition of the Human Motor Cortex. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 10:560. PMC: 5093129. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00560. View

11.

Rawji V, Ciocca M, Zacharia A, Soares D, Truong D, Bikson M . tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow. Brain Stimul. 2017; 11(2):289-298. PMC: 5805821. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.11.001. View

12.

Wetmore D, Baker S . Post-spike distance-to-threshold trajectories of neurones in monkey motor cortex. J Physiol. 2004; 555(Pt 3):831-50. PMC: 1664859. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.048918. View

13.

Sauseng P, Klimesch W, Gerloff C, Hummel F . Spontaneous locally restricted EEG alpha activity determines cortical excitability in the motor cortex. Neuropsychologia. 2008; 47(1):284-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.021. View

14.

Gross J, Timmermann L, Kujala J, Dirks M, Schmitz F, Salmelin R . The neural basis of intermittent motor control in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(4):2299-302. PMC: 122359. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.032682099. View

15.

Suzuki M, Suzuki T, Wang Y, Hamaguchi T . Changes in Magnitude and Variability of Corticospinal Excitability During Rewarded Time-Sensitive Behavior. Front Behav Neurosci. 2019; 13:147. PMC: 6614518. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00147. View

16.

Bikson M, Datta A, Rahman A, Scaturro J . Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: role of "return" electrode's position and size. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010; 121(12):1976-8. PMC: 2983105. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.05.020. View

17.

Whittington M, Traub R, Jefferys J . Synchronized oscillations in interneuron networks driven by metabotropic glutamate receptor activation. Nature. 1995; 373(6515):612-5. DOI: 10.1038/373612a0. View

18.

Schutter D, de Weijer A, Meuwese J, Morgan B, van Honk J . Interrelations between motivational stance, cortical excitability, and the frontal electroencephalogram asymmetry of emotion: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007; 29(5):574-80. PMC: 6870764. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20417. View

19.

Helfrich R, Schneider T, Rach S, Trautmann-Lengsfeld S, Engel A, Herrmann C . Entrainment of brain oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation. Curr Biol. 2014; 24(3):333-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.041. View

20.

Ogata K, Nakazono H, Uehara T, Tobimatsu S . Prestimulus cortical EEG oscillations can predict the excitability of the primary motor cortex. Brain Stimul. 2019; 12(6):1508-1516. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.06.013. View