» Articles » PMID: 35199064

Effect of Imputation on Gene Network Reconstruction from Single-cell RNA-seq Data

Overview
Journal Patterns (N Y)
Date 2022 Feb 24
PMID 35199064
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite the advances in single-cell transcriptomics, the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks remains challenging. Both the large amount of zero counts in experimental data and the lack of a consensus preprocessing pipeline for single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data make it hard to infer networks. Imputation can be applied in order to enhance gene-gene correlations and facilitate downstream analysis. However, it is unclear what consequences imputation methods have on the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks. To study this, we evaluate the differences on the performance and structure of reconstructed networks before and after imputation in single-cell data. We observe an inflation of gene-gene correlations that affects the predicted network structures and may decrease the performance of network reconstruction in general. However, within the modest limits of achievable results, we also make a recommendation as to an advisable combination of algorithms while warning against the indiscriminate use of imputation before network reconstruction in general.

Citing Articles

AUGMENTED DOUBLY ROBUST POST-IMPUTATION INFERENCE FOR PROTEOMIC DATA.

Moon H, Du J, Lei J, Roeder K bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39868108 PMC: 11761724. DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.23.586387.


SIGRN: Inferring Gene Regulatory Network with Soft Introspective Variational Autoencoders.

Li R, Wu J, Li G, Liu J, Liu J, Xuan J Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(23).

PMID: 39684451 PMC: 11641499. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252312741.


Scalable identification of lineage-specific gene regulatory networks from metacells with NetID.

Wang W, Wang Y, Lyu R, Grun D Genome Biol. 2024; 25(1):275.

PMID: 39425176 PMC: 11488259. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-024-03418-0.


COFFEE: consensus single cell-type specific inference for gene regulatory networks.

Lodi M, Chernikov A, Ghosh P Brief Bioinform. 2024; 25(6).

PMID: 39311699 PMC: 11418232. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbae457.


Advances in computational and experimental approaches for deciphering transcriptional regulatory networks: Understanding the roles of cis-regulatory elements is essential, and recent research utilizing MPRAs, STARR-seq, CRISPR-Cas9, and machine....

Moeckel C, Mouratidis I, Chantzi N, Uzun Y, Georgakopoulos-Soares I Bioessays. 2024; 46(7):e2300210.

PMID: 38715516 PMC: 11444527. DOI: 10.1002/bies.202300210.


References
1.
Breda J, Zavolan M, van Nimwegen E . Bayesian inference of gene expression states from single-cell RNA-seq data. Nat Biotechnol. 2021; 39(8):1008-1016. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-021-00875-x. View

2.
Blencowe M, Arneson D, Ding J, Chen Y, Saleem Z, Yang X . Network modeling of single-cell omics data: challenges, opportunities, and progresses. Emerg Top Life Sci. 2020; 3(4):379-398. PMC: 7141415. DOI: 10.1042/etls20180176. View

3.
Huynh-Thu V, Irrthum A, Wehenkel L, Geurts P . Inferring regulatory networks from expression data using tree-based methods. PLoS One. 2010; 5(9). PMC: 2946910. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012776. View

4.
Szklarczyk D, Gable A, Lyon D, Junge A, Wyder S, Huerta-Cepas J . STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 47(D1):D607-D613. PMC: 6323986. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1131. View

5.
Lun A, Bach K, Marioni J . Pooling across cells to normalize single-cell RNA sequencing data with many zero counts. Genome Biol. 2016; 17:75. PMC: 4848819. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-016-0947-7. View