» Articles » PMID: 35191597

Rapid Rehabilitation Effect on Complications, Wound Infection, Anastomotic Leak, Obstruction, and Hospital Re-admission for Gastrointestinal Surgery Subjects: A Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Int Wound J
Date 2022 Feb 22
PMID 35191597
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of rapid rehabilitation on the curative effect of gastrointestinal surgery subjects. A systematic literature search up to October 2021 was done and 31 studies included 4448 subjects with gastrointestinal surgery at the start of the study: 2242 of them were provided with rapid rehabilitation and 2206 were standard care. They were reporting relationships about the effect of rapid rehabilitation on the curative effect of gastrointestinal surgery subjects. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the effect of rapid rehabilitation on the curative effect of gastrointestinal surgery subjects using the dichotomous method with a random- or fixed-effect model. Rapid rehabilitation had significantly lower complications (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.54-0.71, P < .001) and wound infection (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.98, P = .03) compared with standard care in subjects with gastrointestinal surgery. However, rapid rehabilitation had no significant effect on the anastomotic leak (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.66-1.22, P = .49), obstruction (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, -0.64 to 1.31, P = .65), and hospital re-admission (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57-1.08, P = .13) compared with standard care in subjects with gastrointestinal surgery. Rapid rehabilitation had significantly lower complications and wound infection, and had no significant effect on the anastomotic leak, obstruction, and hospital re-admission compared with standard care in subjects with gastrointestinal surgery. Further studies are required to validate these findings.

Citing Articles

Rapid rehabilitation effect on complications, wound infection, anastomotic leak, obstruction, and hospital re-admission for gastrointestinal surgery subjects: A meta-analysis.

Liu L, He L, Qiu A, Zhang M Int Wound J. 2022; 19(6):1539-1550.

PMID: 35191597 PMC: 9493214. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13753.

References
1.
Wang G, Jiang Z, Zhao K, Li G, Liu F, Pan H . Immunologic response after laparoscopic colon cancer operation within an enhanced recovery program. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16(7):1379-88. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-1880-z. View

2.
Gouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A, Xynos E, Tekkis P . Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009; 24(10):1119-31. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0703-5. View

3.
Jia Y, Jin G, Guo S, Gu B, Jin Z, Gao X . Fast-track surgery decreases the incidence of postoperative delirium and other complications in elderly patients with colorectal carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013; 399(1):77-84. PMC: 3890038. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-013-1151-9. View

4.
Carli F, Mayo N, Klubien K, Schricker T, Trudel J, Belliveau P . Epidural analgesia enhances functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life after colonic surgery: results of a randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2002; 97(3):540-9. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200209000-00005. View

5.
Ostermann S, Morel P, Chale J, Bucher P, Konrad B, Meier R . Randomized Controlled Trial of Enhanced Recovery Program Dedicated to Elderly Patients After Colorectal Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019; 62(9):1105-1116. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001442. View