» Articles » PMID: 35186125

Selection of X-ray Magnetic Resonance Imaging As a First-line Imaging Modality for Diagnosing Axial Spondyloarthritis

Overview
Date 2022 Feb 21
PMID 35186125
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: To determine the cut-off values for age and symptom duration that could be used in selecting preferential first-line imaging modality of sacroiliac joints [X-ray magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] for diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 388 patients newly diagnosed with axSpA. Patients were classified into radiographic axSpA (n = 322) and non-radiographic axSpA (n = 66) groups according to the fulfilment of modified New York criteria by X-ray. Patient characteristics of the two groups were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine the cut-off values for age and symptom duration that best distinguish non-radiographic axSpA from radiographic axSpA.

Results: Compared with patients with radiographic axSpA, those with non-radiographic axSpA were younger at diagnosis (35.7 ± 11.3 years 26.8 ± 7.8 years,  < 0.001) and had shorter symptom duration [5.1 (2.1-12.0) years 1.0 (0.5-3.2) years,  < 0.001]. ROC analysis showed that age > 33.5 years at diagnosis [area under the curve (AUC): 0.734] and symptom duration > 4.1 years (AUC: 0.787) were the cut-off values that best discriminate radiographic axSpA from non-radiographic axSpA.

Conclusion: The best cut-off values for age and symptom duration for predicting radiographic sacroiliitis are 33.5 and 4.1 years, respectively. It is reasonable to use X-ray as a first-line imaging modality in patients older than 33.5 years with a symptom duration longer than 4.1 years, and use MRI as a first-line imaging in patients younger than 33.5 years with a symptom duration less than 4.1 years.

References
1.
Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R . The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 68 Suppl 2:ii1-44. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2008.104018. View

2.
Poddubnyy D, Brandt H, Vahldiek J, Spiller I, Song I, Rudwaleit M . The frequency of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis in relation to symptom duration in patients referred because of chronic back pain: results from the Berlin early spondyloarthritis clinic. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012; 71(12):1998-2001. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201945. View

3.
Lopez-Medina C, Ramiro S, van der Heijde D, Sieper J, Dougados M, Molto A . Characteristics and burden of disease in patients with radiographic and non-radiographic axial Spondyloarthritis: a comparison by systematic literature review and meta-analysis. RMD Open. 2019; 5(2):e001108. PMC: 6890393. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001108. View

4.
Maksymowych W, Lambert R, Ostergaard M, Pedersen S, Machado P, Weber U . MRI lesions in the sacroiliac joints of patients with spondyloarthritis: an update of definitions and validation by the ASAS MRI working group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019; 78(11):1550-1558. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215589. View

5.
van der Linden S, VALKENBURG H, Cats A . Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984; 27(4):361-8. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780270401. View