» Articles » PMID: 28283515

Comparison of MRI with Radiography for Detecting Structural Lesions of the Sacroiliac Joint Using CT As Standard of Reference: Results from the SIMACT Study

Overview
Journal Ann Rheum Dis
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2017 Mar 12
PMID 28283515
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Radiographs of sacroiliac (SI) joints are used for the detection of structural damage in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but are often difficult to interpret. Here, we address the question how the T1-weighted MRI (T1w MRI) sequence compares with radiography for SI joints' structural lesions using low-dose CT as the standard of reference.

Methods: Radiographs, T1w MRI and low-dose CT of the SI joints from 110 patients (mean age 36.1 (19-57) years, 52% males and 48% females; 53% with axSpA, 21 non-radiographic axSpA and 32% radiographic axSpA, 47% with non-SpA) referred to the rheumatologist because of unclear chronic back pain, but possible axSpA, were scored for structural lesions (erosions, sclerosis, joint space changes and an overall impression of positivity).

Results: Using low-dose CT as the standard of reference, T1w MRI showed markedly better sensitivity with significantly more correct imaging findings compared with radiography for erosions (79% vs 42%; p=0.002), joint space changes (75% vs 41%; p=0.002) and overall positivity (85% vs 48%; p=0.001), respectively, while there were no differences between X-rays and MRI-T1 sequence regarding specificity (>80% for all scores). Only for sclerosis, MRI-T1 was inferior to radiography (sensitivity 30% vs 70%, respectively), however, not statistically significant (p=0.663).

Conclusions: T1w MRI was superior to radiography in the detection of structural lesion of the SI joints in patients with axSpA. Future studies should focus on finding an agreement on the definition of MRI-T1 positivity.

Citing Articles

Diagnosing Ankylosing Spondylitis via Architecture-Modified ResNet and Combined Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imagery.

Castro-Zunti R, Park E, Park H, Choi Y, Jin G, Chae H J Imaging Inform Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40032762 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-025-01427-4.


Influence of sacroiliac joint variation on clinical features of axial spondyloarthritis: a comparative analysis.

Aleixo C, Ziegeler K, Ulas S, Diekhoff T, Greese J, Lindholz M RMD Open. 2025; 11(1).

PMID: 39922705 PMC: 11808880. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004923.


Differentiation of Early Sacroiliitis Using Machine-Learning- Supported Texture Analysis.

Zhu Q, Wang Q, Hu X, Dang X, Yu X, Chen L Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(2.

PMID: 39857093 PMC: 11763746. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15020209.


Distribution of spinal damage in patients with axial spondyloarthritis as assessed by MRI: a prospective and blinded study.

Haidmayer A, Adelsmayr G, Spreizer C, Klocker E, Quehenberger F, Fuchsjaeger M Arthritis Res Ther. 2025; 27(1):8.

PMID: 39810235 PMC: 11730832. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-024-03465-9.


Anatomy-centred deep learning improves generalisability and progression prediction in radiographic sacroiliitis detection.

Dorfner F, Vahldiek J, Donle L, Zhukov A, Xu L, Hantze H RMD Open. 2024; 10(4.

PMID: 39719299 PMC: 11751840. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004628.