» Articles » PMID: 35177793

Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation (SIP) Will Soon Become the Most Common Form of Surgical Bowel Disease in the Extremely Low Birth Weight (ELBW) Infant

Overview
Journal J Perinatol
Date 2022 Feb 18
PMID 35177793
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent data have revealed declines in the prevalence rates of NEC over the last decade in premature infants. In contrast, SIP has either remained steady or risen during the same epoch. These trends are consistent with our knowledge of the clinical arena. The ability to discern SIP contamination within NEC datasets has slowly improved. Additionally, quality improvement efforts are being utilized to reduce NEC through stewardship of antibiotics, acid inhibitors, central lines and blood products, as well as optimization of human milk diets. These forces are moving us to a new era, where NEC will no longer be the dominant surgical intestinal disease of the extremely preterm neonate. Indeed, in the extremely low birth weight (ELBW) population, SIP may already be the most prevalent reason for abdominal surgery. In this perspective, the reader will find supporting data and references for these assertions as well as predictions for the future.

Citing Articles

Retrospective bi-centric observational study comparing primary anastomosis or suturing vs enterostomy for spontaneous intestinal perforations in extremely preterm infants.

Genet E, Gounfle E, Bonnard A, Jaby O, Wang X, Jung C Eur J Pediatr. 2025; 184(3):215.

PMID: 40019632 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-025-06043-6.


The Association Between Perinatal Pharmacologic Treatments and Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

Cheng W, Tu L, Chiang M, Chen Y, Wu W, Hsu K Children (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40003244 PMC: 11854389. DOI: 10.3390/children12020142.


Use of NSAIDs and acetaminophen and risk of spontaneous intestinal perforations in premature infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hudson J, Shabbir W, Hayawi L, Chan M, Barrowman N, Sikora L Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1450121.

PMID: 39649405 PMC: 11620902. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1450121.


Necrotizing enterocolitis following spontaneous intestinal perforation in very low birth weight neonates.

Dantes G, Keane O, Raikot S, Do L, Rumbika S, He Z J Perinatol. 2024; .

PMID: 39448869 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-024-02155-3.


Identifying Preoperative Clinical Characteristics of Unexpected Gastrointestinal Perforation in Infants-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Pijpers A, Gorter R, Eeftinck Schattenkerk L, van Schuppen J, van den Akker C, Vanhamel S Children (Basel). 2024; 11(5).

PMID: 38790500 PMC: 11119732. DOI: 10.3390/children11050505.


References
1.
Fatemizadeh R, Mandal S, Gollins L, Shah S, Premkumar M, Hair A . Incidence of spontaneous intestinal perforations exceeds necrotizing enterocolitis in extremely low birth weight infants fed an exclusive human milk-based diet: A single center experience. J Pediatr Surg. 2020; 56(5):1051-1056. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.09.015. View

2.
Yang H, Min J, Byun J, Ko D, Kim H, Min K . Incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in South Korea from 2007 to 2017. J Perinatol. 2021; 41(5):1092-1099. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-01053-2. View

3.
Javidi D, Wang Z, Rajasekaran S, Hussain N . Temporal and seasonal variations in incidence of stage II and III NEC-a 28-year epidemiologic study from tertiary NICUs in Connecticut, USA. J Perinatol. 2021; 41(5):1100-1109. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-00961-7. View

4.
Blakely M, Tyson J, Lally K, Hintz S, Eggleston B, Stevenson D . Initial Laparotomy Versus Peritoneal Drainage in Extremely Low Birthweight Infants With Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis or Isolated Intestinal Perforation: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2021; 274(4):e370-e380. PMC: 8439547. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005099. View

5.
Stoll B, Hansen N, Bell E, Walsh M, Carlo W, Shankaran S . Trends in Care Practices, Morbidity, and Mortality of Extremely Preterm Neonates, 1993-2012. JAMA. 2015; 314(10):1039-51. PMC: 4787615. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.10244. View