» Articles » PMID: 35174263

Deep Learning-based Electrocardiogram Rhythm and Beat Features for Heart Abnormality Classification

Overview
Date 2022 Feb 17
PMID 35174263
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Electrocardiogram (ECG) signal classification plays a critical role in the automatic diagnosis of heart abnormalities. While most ECG signal patterns cannot be recognized by a human interpreter, they can be detected with precision using artificial intelligence approaches, making the ECG a powerful non-invasive biomarker. However, performing rapid and accurate ECG signal classification is difficult due to the low amplitude, complexity, and non-linearity. The widely-available deep learning (DL) method we propose has presented an opportunity to substantially improve the accuracy of automated ECG classification analysis using rhythm or beat features. Unfortunately, a comprehensive and general evaluation of the specific DL architecture for ECG analysis across a wide variety of rhythm and beat features has not been previously reported. Some previous studies have been concerned with detecting ECG class abnormalities only through rhythm or beat features separately.

Methods: This study proposes a single architecture based on the DL method with one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) architecture, to automatically classify 24 patterns of ECG signals through both rhythm and beat. To validate the proposed model, five databases which consisted of nine-class of ECG-base rhythm and 15-class of ECG-based beat were used in this study. The proposed DL network was applied and studied with varying datasets with different frequency samplings in intra and inter-patient scheme.

Results: Using a 10-fold cross-validation scheme, the performance results had an accuracy of 99.98%, a sensitivity of 99.90%, a specificity of 99.89%, a precision of 99.90%, and an F1-score of 99.99% for ECG rhythm classification. Additionally, for ECG beat classification, the model obtained an accuracy of 99.87%, a sensitivity of 96.97%, a specificity of 99.89%, a precision of 92.23%, and an F1-score of 94.39%. In conclusion, this study provides clinicians with an advanced methodology for detecting and discriminating heart abnormalities between different ECG rhythm and beat assessments by using one outstanding proposed DL architecture.

Citing Articles

Identifying the presence of atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm using a dual-input mixed neural network with ECG coloring technology.

Chen W, Liu C, Tseng C, Huang C, Wu I, Chen P BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024; 24(1):318.

PMID: 39716064 PMC: 11665121. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02421-0.


Use of machine learning and Poincaré density grid in the diagnosis of sinus node dysfunction caused by sinoatrial conduction block in dogs.

Flanders W, Moise N, Otani N J Vet Intern Med. 2024; 38(3):1305-1324.

PMID: 38682817 PMC: 11099791. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.17071.


Non-Invasive Biosensing for Healthcare Using Artificial Intelligence: A Semi-Systematic Review.

Islam T, Washington P Biosensors (Basel). 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38667177 PMC: 11048540. DOI: 10.3390/bios14040183.


Race, Sex, and Age Disparities in the Performance of ECG Deep Learning Models Predicting Heart Failure.

Kaur D, Hughes J, Rogers A, Kang G, Narayan S, Ashley E Circ Heart Fail. 2023; 17(1):e010879.

PMID: 38126168 PMC: 10984643. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.010879.


Learning EKG Diagnostic Models with Hierarchical Class Label Dependencies.

Wang J, Hauskrecht M Artif Intell Med Conf Artif Intell Med (2005-). 2023; 13897:260-270.

PMID: 37303465 PMC: 10256236. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-34344-5_31.


References
1.
Kwon J, Jeon K, Kim H, Kim M, Lim S, Kim K . Comparing the performance of artificial intelligence and conventional diagnosis criteria for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy using electrocardiography. Europace. 2019; 22(3):412-419. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euz324. View

2.
Yildirim O, Baloglu U, Tan R, Ciaccio E, Rajendra Acharya U . A new approach for arrhythmia classification using deep coded features and LSTM networks. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019; 176:121-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.05.004. View

3.
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G . Deep learning. Nature. 2015; 521(7553):436-44. DOI: 10.1038/nature14539. View

4.
Hannun A, Rajpurkar P, Haghpanahi M, Tison G, Bourn C, Turakhia M . Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection and classification in ambulatory electrocardiograms using a deep neural network. Nat Med. 2019; 25(1):65-69. PMC: 6784839. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0268-3. View

5.
Yildirim O, Talo M, Ciaccio E, Tan R, Rajendra Acharya U . Accurate deep neural network model to detect cardiac arrhythmia on more than 10,000 individual subject ECG records. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020; 197:105740. PMC: 7477611. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105740. View