Longitudinal Trajectories of Participant- and Study Partner-Rated Cognitive Decline, in Relation to Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers and Mood Symptoms
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Whereas discrepancies between participant- and study partner-reported cognitive concerns on the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum have been observed, more needs to be known regarding the longitudinal trajectories of participant- vs. study partner-reported concerns, particularly their relationship to AD biomarkers and mood symptomology. Additionally, it is unclear whether years of in-clinic data collection are needed to observe relationships with AD biomarkers, or whether more frequent, remote assessments over shorter periods of time would suffice. This study primarily sought to examine the relationships between longitudinal trajectories of participant- and study partner-rated cognitive decline and baseline biomarker levels [i.e., amyloid and tau positron emission tomography (PET)], in addition to how mood symptomatology may alter these trajectories of concerns over a 2-year period. Baseline mood was associated with longitudinal participant-rated concerns, such that participants with elevated depression and anxiety scores at baseline had decreasing concerns about cognitive decline over time (fixed estimate = -0.17, 95% CI [-0.29 to -0.05], = -2.75, df = 457, adj. = 0.012). A significant interaction between baseline amyloid (fixed estimate = 4.07, 95% CI [1.13-7.01], = 2.72, df = 353, adj. = 0.026) and tau (fixed estimate = 3.50, 95% CI [0.95-6.06], = 2.70, df = 331, adj. = 0.030) levels was associated with increasing study partner concerns, but not participant concerns, over time. The interaction between amyloid and study partner concerns remained significant when utilizing only the first year of concern-related data collection. Overall, these results suggest that frequent, remote assessment of study partner-reported concerns may offer additional insight into the AD clinical spectrum, as study partners appear to more accurately update their concerns over time with regard to pathology, with these concerns less influenced by participants' mood symptomatology.
Miller M, Diaz A, Conti C, Albala B, Flenniken D, Fockler J Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 20(10):7232-7247.
PMID: 39219153 PMC: 11485063. DOI: 10.1002/alz.14234.
Longitudinal Trajectories of the Cognitive Function Index in the A4 Study.
Amariglio R, Grill J, Rentz D, Marshall G, Donohue M, Liu A J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024; 11(4):838-845.
PMID: 39044492 PMC: 11266220. DOI: 10.14283/jpad.2024.125.
Evans S, Paitel E, Bhasin R, Nielson K J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2024; 8(1):267-279.
PMID: 38405345 PMC: 10894609. DOI: 10.3233/ADR-230166.
Perez-Blanco L, Felpete-Lopez A, Nieto-Vieites A, Lojo-Seoane C, Campos-Magdaleno M, Fernandez-Feijoo F Front Aging Neurosci. 2024; 16:1319743.
PMID: 38371398 PMC: 10870422. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1319743.
Recent contributions to the field of subjective cognitive decline in aging: A literature review.
Munro C, Boyle R, Chen X, Coughlan G, Gonzalez C, Jutten R Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2023; 15(4):e12475.
PMID: 37869044 PMC: 10585124. DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12475.