» Articles » PMID: 35170729

Quality of Dietary Carbohydrate is More Important Than Its Quantity in Lipid Peroxidation

Overview
Journal Am J Clin Nutr
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2022 Feb 16
PMID 35170729
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: High glycemic index (GI) diets have been linked to elevated risk of cardiometabolic diseases. One possible underlying mechanism comes from high GI diet's potential to promote lipid peroxidation.

Objectives: We aim to evaluate whether and to what extent dietary carbohydrate quality and quantity are associated with systemic levels of lipid peroxidation in females.

Methods: In this cross-sectional analysis of 2163 middle-aged women, a subset of the Shanghai Women's Health Study, we measured lipid peroxidation biomarkers F2-isoprostanes (F2-IsoPs) and its metabolite, 2,3-dinor-5,6-dihydro-15-F2t-IsoP (F2-IsoP-M), in urine. The quality of carbohydrate was defined by dietary GI, assessed using a validated FFQ via in-person interviews. A multivariable linear regression model with restricted cubic spline functions was used to evaluate the association of measured biomarkers with carbohydrate intake and dietary GI.

Results: After adjustment for potential confounding factors such as cigarette smoking, BMI, and comorbidities, among others, we found that F2-IsoP-M concentrations were positively associated with both carbohydrate intake and dietary GI. Carbohydrate intake and dietary GI were weakly correlated (r = 0.12). When further mutually adjusted for the 2 factors, the positive association with F2-IsoP-M remained statistically significant for GI (P = 0.004) but not for carbohydrate intake (P = 0.50). Compared with those in the 10th percentile of dietary GI, fold increases (95% CI) in F2-IsoP-M concentrations for those in the 30th, 50th, 70th, and 90th percentiles were 1.03 (1.00, 1.07), 1.06 (1.01, 1.10), 1.09 (1.03, 1.14), and 1.13 (1.05, 1.21), respectively. Moreover, there appeared a threshold regarding the association between dietary GI and F2-IsoP-M concentrations, with the dose-effect slope of GI being 2.3 times greater when GI was ≥75 relative to GI <75.

Conclusions: This study provides evidence that the quality of dietary carbohydrate may be more important than the quantity of the intake with regard to systemic lipid peroxidation.

Citing Articles

Identification of novel F-isoprostane metabolites by specific UDP-glucuronosyltransferases.

Milne G, Nogueira M, Gao B, Sanchez S, Amin W, Thomas S Redox Biol. 2024; 70:103020.

PMID: 38211441 PMC: 10821610. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2023.103020.


Association between F2-Isoprostane Metabolites and Weight Change in Older Women: A Longitudinal Analysis.

Zhao Y, Nogueira M, Chen Q, Dai Q, Cai Q, Wen W Gerontology. 2023; 70(2):134-142.

PMID: 37967546 PMC: 10922451. DOI: 10.1159/000534258.


Association between lipid peroxidation and risk of type 2 diabetes in women.

Zhao Y, Milne G, Chen Q, Dai Q, Zhang X, Nogueira M Free Radic Res. 2022; 56(7-8):536-543.

PMID: 36480242 PMC: 10373923. DOI: 10.1080/10715762.2022.2154667.

References
1.
Bowen P, Borthakur G . Postprandial lipid oxidation and cardiovascular disease risk. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2004; 6(6):477-84. DOI: 10.1007/s11883-004-0089-3. View

2.
Ceriello A, Bortolotti N, Motz E, Pieri C, Marra M, Tonutti L . Meal-induced oxidative stress and low-density lipoprotein oxidation in diabetes: the possible role of hyperglycemia. Metabolism. 1999; 48(12):1503-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0026-0495(99)90237-8. View

3.
Brand-Miller J, Hayne S, Petocz P, Colagiuri S . Low-glycemic index diets in the management of diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(8):2261-7. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.8.2261. View

4.
Ilyasova D, Scarbrough P, Spasojevic I . Urinary biomarkers of oxidative status. Clin Chim Acta. 2012; 413(19-20):1446-53. PMC: 3424057. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.06.012. View

5.
Alessa H, Cohen R, Malik V, Adebamowo S, Rimm E, Manson J . Carbohydrate quality and quantity and risk of coronary heart disease among US women and men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018; 107(2):257-267. PMC: 6454480. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqx060. View