» Articles » PMID: 35168748

Politicization and COVID-19 Vaccine Resistance in the U.S

Overview
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2022 Feb 16
PMID 35168748
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Science is frequently used and distorted to advance political, economic, or cultural agendas. The politicization of science can limit the positive impacts that scientific advances can offer when people reject sound and beneficial scientific advice. Politicization has undoubtedly contributed to hesitancy toward uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine. It is urgent for scientists and clinicians to better understand: (1) the roots of politicization as related to COVID-19 vaccines; (2) the factors that influence people's receptivity to scientific misinformation in politicized contexts; and (3) how to combat the politicization of science to increase the use of life-saving vaccines. This chapter explores these issues in the context of COVID-19 vaccine resistance in the United States. After briefly describing the development of the vaccines, we describe the ways in which the disease itself became politicized because of statements by political leaders and also by media accounts including social media. We then review the politicization of the vaccine at both national and international scales, variability in public acceptance of the vaccines in the United States, and response to the emergence of variants. The next section summarizes social science findings on overcoming vaccine resistance, and the concluding section outlines some of the lessons of the politicization of the disease and the vaccine for health practitioners and life scientists.

Citing Articles

Using machine learning to identify COVID-19 vaccine-hesitancy predictors in the USA.

Saldarriaga E BMJ Public Health. 2025; 1(1):e000456.

PMID: 40017853 PMC: 11812730. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000456.


From information to action: modelling social and cognitive factors in health decisions.

Yu J, Bekerian D BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):508.

PMID: 39920594 PMC: 11806782. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21721-8.


COVID-19 vaccination attitudes and acceptance among people with serious mental illness.

Small W, Silva C, Johnson R, Betti V, Nguyen A, Todd L Front Psychiatry. 2025; 15:1535780.

PMID: 39911558 PMC: 11794492. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1535780.


Association of gross domestic product with equitable access to childhood vaccines in 195 countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dinga J, Akinbobola J, Afolayan F, Njoh A, Kassa T, Lazarus D BMJ Glob Health. 2025; 10(1).

PMID: 39828433 PMC: 11749592. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015693.


Sociopolitical antecedents influencing COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Pima County, Arizona.

Rodriguez S, Haider K, Patel F, Thatigiri G, Pope B, Albana J Vaccine X. 2024; 22:100589.

PMID: 39719942 PMC: 11665536. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100589.


References
1.
Motta M . Can a COVID-19 vaccine live up to Americans' expectations? A conjoint analysis of how vaccine characteristics influence vaccination intentions. Soc Sci Med. 2021; 272:113642. PMC: 7832269. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113642. View

2.
Norton A, Olliaro P, Sigfrid L, Carson G, Paparella G, Hastie C . Long COVID: tackling a multifaceted condition requires a multidisciplinary approach. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021; 21(5):601-602. PMC: 7906694. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00043-8. View

3.
Bolsen T, Palm R, Kingsland J . Framing the Origins of COVID-19. Sci Commun. 2024; 42(5):562-585. PMC: 7484600. DOI: 10.1177/1075547020953603. View

4.
Chou W, Gaysynsky A, Vanderpool R . The COVID-19 Misinfodemic: Moving Beyond Fact-Checking. Health Educ Behav. 2020; 48(1):9-13. PMC: 8685465. DOI: 10.1177/1090198120980675. View

5.
Grossman G, Kim S, Rexer J, Thirumurthy H . Political partisanship influences behavioral responses to governors' recommendations for COVID-19 prevention in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(39):24144-24153. PMC: 7533884. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2007835117. View