» Articles » PMID: 35164796

A Web-based Prediction Model for Overall Survival of Elderly Patients with Early Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Population-based Study

Overview
Journal J Transl Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Feb 15
PMID 35164796
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The number of elderly patients with early renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is on the rise. However, there is still a lack of accurate prediction models for the prognosis of early RCC in elderly patients. It is necessary to establish a new nomogram to predict the prognosis of elderly patients with early RCC.

Methods: The data of patients aged above 65 years old with TNM stage I and II RCC were downloaded from the SEER database between 2010 and 2018. The patients from 2010 to 2017 were randomly assigned to the training cohort (n = 7233) and validation cohort (n = 3024). Patient data in 2018(n = 1360) was used for external validation. We used univariable and multivariable Cox regression model to evaluate independent prognostic factors and constructed a nomogram to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of patients with early-stage RCC. Multiple parameters were used to validate the nomogram, including the consistency index (C-index), the calibration plots, the area under the receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve, and the decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: The study included a total of 11,617 elderly patients with early RCC. univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis based on predictive variables such as age, sex, histologic type, Fuhrman grade, T stage, surgery type, tumors number, tumor size, and marriage were included to establish a nomogram. The C-index of the training cohort and validation cohort were 0.748 (95% CI: 0.760-0.736) and 0.744 (95% CI: 0.762-0.726), respectively. In the external validation cohort, C-index was 0.893 (95% CI: 0.928-0.858). The calibration plots basically coincides with the diagonal, indicating that the observed OS was almost equal to the predicted OS. It was shown in DCA that the nomogram has more important clinical significance than the traditional TNM stage.

Conclusion: A novel nomogram was developed to assess the prognosis of an elderly patient with early RCC and to predict prognosis and formulate treatment and follow-up strategies.

Citing Articles

A Novel Nomogram for the Prediction and Evaluation of Prognosis in Patients with Early-onset Kidney Cancer: a Population-based Study.

Lv D, Wang Q, Sun K, Li J, Zhou H, Wen J J Cancer. 2025; 16(4):1189-1201.

PMID: 39895778 PMC: 11786041. DOI: 10.7150/jca.104569.


Transcriptome-based network analysis related to regulatory T cells infiltration identified RCN1 as a potential biomarker for prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Qixin Y, Jing H, Jiang H, Xueyang L, Lu Y, Yuehua L BioData Min. 2024; 17(1):51.

PMID: 39543725 PMC: 11566375. DOI: 10.1186/s13040-024-00404-x.


Mitophagy and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: insights from single-cell and spatial transcriptomics analysis.

Jiang L, Ren X, Yang J, Chen H, Zhang S, Zhou X Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1400431.

PMID: 38994370 PMC: 11236570. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1400431.


Mortality prediction and influencing factors for intensive care unit patients with acute tubular necrosis: random survival forest and cox regression analysis.

Zeng J, Zhang M, Du J, Han J, Song Q, Duan T Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1361923.

PMID: 38846097 PMC: 11153709. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1361923.


Prognostic factors of renal cell cancer in elderly patients: a population-based cohort study.

Pajunen H, Veitonmaki T, Huhtala H, Nikkola J, Poyhonen A, Murtola T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):6295.

PMID: 38491173 PMC: 10942969. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56835-3.


References
1.
Zini L, Perrotte P, Capitanio U, Jeldres C, Shariat S, Antebi E . Radical versus partial nephrectomy: effect on overall and noncancer mortality. Cancer. 2009; 115(7):1465-71. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24035. View

2.
Vickers A, Cronin A, Elkin E, Gonen M . Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008; 8:53. PMC: 2611975. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-53. View

3.
Taub D, Miller D, Cowan J, Dimick J, Montie J, Wei J . Impact of surgical volume on mortality and length of stay after nephrectomy. Urology. 2004; 63(5):862-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.11.037. View

4.
Chawla S, Crispen P, Hanlon A, Greenberg R, Chen D, Uzzo R . The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature. J Urol. 2006; 175(2):425-31. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00148-5. View

5.
Siegel R, Miller K, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020; 70(1):7-30. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21590. View