» Articles » PMID: 35162624

County-Wide Mortality Assessments Attributable to PM Emissions from Coal Consumption in Taiwan

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Feb 15
PMID 35162624
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over one-third of energy is generated from coal consumption in Taiwan. In order to estimate the health impact assessment attributable to PM concentrations emitted from coal consumption in Taiwan. We applied a Gaussian trajectory transfer-coefficient model to obtain county-wide PM exposures from coal consumption, which includes coal-fired power plants and combined heat and power plants. Next, we calculated the mortality burden attributable to PM emitted by coal consumption using the comparative risk assessment framework developed by the Global Burden of Disease study. Based on county-level data, the average PM emissions from coal-fired plants in Taiwan was estimated at 2.03 ± 1.29 (range: 0.32-5.64) μg/m. With PM increments greater than 0.1 μg/m, there were as many as 16 counties and 66 air quality monitoring stations affected by coal-fired plants and 6 counties and 18 monitoring stations affected by combined heat and power plants. The maximum distances affected by coal-fired and combined heat and power plants were 272 km and 157 km, respectively. Our findings show that more counties were affected by coal-fired plants than by combined heat and power plants with significant increments of PM emissions. We estimated that 359.6 (95% CI: 334.8-384.9) annual adult deaths and 124.4 (95% CI: 116.4-132.3) annual premature deaths were attributable to PM emitted by coal-fired plants in Taiwan. Even in six counties without power plants, there were 75.8 (95% CI: 60.1-91.5) deaths and 25.8 (95%CI: 20.7-30.9) premature deaths annually attributable to PM emitted from neighboring coal-fired plants. This study presents a precise and effective integrated approach for assessing air pollution and the health impacts of coal-fired and combined heat and power plants.

Citing Articles

Association between PM2.5 and skin redness features in Taiwan.

Chan F, Chio C, Yuan T, Shih S, Shih C, Chan C PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025; 5(3):e0004357.

PMID: 40073012 PMC: 11902050. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004357.

References
1.
Gohlke J, Thomas R, Woodward A, Campbell-Lendrum D, Pruss-Ustun A, Hales S . Estimating the global public health implications of electricity and coal consumption. Environ Health Perspect. 2011; 119(6):821-6. PMC: 3114817. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.119-821. View

2.
Lin C, Lin R, Chen T, Zigler C, Wei Y, Christiani D . A global perspective on coal-fired power plants and burden of lung cancer. Environ Health. 2019; 18(1):9. PMC: 6350330. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-019-0448-8. View

3.
Giannadaki D, Lelieveld J, Pozzer A . Implementing the US air quality standard for PM2.5 worldwide can prevent millions of premature deaths per year. Environ Health. 2016; 15(1):88. PMC: 4994265. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-016-0170-8. View

4.
Dockery D, Pope 3rd C, Xu X, Spengler J, Ware J, Fay M . An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329(24):1753-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199312093292401. View

5.
Koplitz S, Jacob D, Sulprizio M, Myllyvirta L, Reid C . Burden of Disease from Rising Coal-Fired Power Plant Emissions in Southeast Asia. Environ Sci Technol. 2017; 51(3):1467-1476. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03731. View