» Articles » PMID: 27552859

Implementing the US Air Quality Standard for PM2.5 Worldwide Can Prevent Millions of Premature Deaths Per Year

Overview
Journal Environ Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2016 Aug 25
PMID 27552859
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Air pollution by fine aerosol particles is among the leading causes of poor health and premature mortality worldwide. The growing awareness of this issue has led several countries to implement air pollution legislation. However, populations in large parts of the world are still exposed to high levels of ambient particulate pollution. The main aim of this work is to evaluate the potential impact of implementing current air quality standards for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in the European Union (EU), United States (US) and other countries where PM2.5 levels are high.

Methods: We use a high-resolution global atmospheric chemistry model combined with epidemiological concentration response functions to investigate premature mortality attributable to PM2.5 in adults ≥30 years and children <5 years. We perform sensitivity studies to estimate the reductions in mortality that could be achieved if the PM2.5 air quality standards of the EU and US and other national standards would be implemented worldwide.

Results: We estimate the global premature mortality by PM2.5 at 3.15 million/year in 2010. China is the leading country with about 1.33 million, followed by India with 575 thousand and Pakistan with 105 thousand per year. For the 28 EU member states we estimate 173 thousand and for the United States 52 thousand premature deaths in 2010. Based on sensitivity analysis, applying worldwide the EU annual mean standard of 25 μg/m(3) for PM2.5 could reduce global premature mortality due to PM2.5 exposure by 17 %; while within the EU the effect is negligible. With the 2012 revised US standard of 12 μg/m(3) premature mortality by PM2.5 could drop by 46 % worldwide; 4 % in the US and 20 % in the EU, 69 % in China, 49 % in India and 36 % in Pakistan. These estimates take into consideration that about 22 % of the global PM2.5 related mortality cannot be avoided due to the contribution of natural PM2.5 sources, mainly airborne desert dust and PM2.5 from wild fires.

Conclusions: Our results reflect the need to adopt stricter limits for annual mean PM2.5 levels globally, like the US standard of 12 μg/m(3) or an even lower limit to substantially reduce premature mortality in most of the world.

Citing Articles

Interventions to reduce the effects of air pollution and of extreme heat on maternal, newborn, and child health outcomes: a mapping of the literature.

Strong J, Barrett R, Surtee Z, OHare M, Conway F, Portela A J Glob Health. 2025; 15:04035.

PMID: 39950557 PMC: 11826960. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.15.04035.


Towards Cleaner Cities: Estimating Vehicle-Induced PM with Hybrid EBM-CMA-ES Modeling.

Alotaibi S, Almujibah H, Mohamed K, Elhassan A, Alsulami B, Alsaluli A Toxics. 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 39591005 PMC: 11598042. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12110827.


Air Pollution and Mortality in India: Investigating the Nexus of Ambient and Household Pollution Across Life Stages.

Adhikary M, Saikia N, Purohit P, Canudas-Romo V, Schopp W Geohealth. 2024; 8(8):e2023GH000968.

PMID: 39165477 PMC: 11333718. DOI: 10.1029/2023GH000968.


Pollution and cardiovascular health: A contemporary review of morbidity and implications for planetary health.

Goldsborough 3rd E, Gopal M, McEvoy J, Blumenthal R, Jacobsen A Am Heart J Plus. 2024; 25:100231.

PMID: 38510496 PMC: 10946040. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100231.


Anthropological responses to environmental challenges in SAARC nations: A comparative analysis.

Liu C, Ahmad M, Altalbe A PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0296516.

PMID: 38330089 PMC: 10852318. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296516.


References
1.
Cooke R, Wilson A, Tuomisto J, Morales O, Tainio M, Evans J . A probabilistic characterization of the relationship between fine particulate matter and mortality: elicitation of European experts. Environ Sci Technol. 2007; 41(18):6598-605. DOI: 10.1021/es0714078. View

2.
Lippmann M, Chen L, Gordon T, Ito K, Thurston G . National Particle Component Toxicity (NPACT) Initiative: integrated epidemiologic and toxicologic studies of the health effects of particulate matter components. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2014; (177):5-13. View

3.
Lim S, Vos T, Flaxman A, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H . A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012; 380(9859):2224-60. PMC: 4156511. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8. View

4.
Anenberg S, Horowitz L, Tong D, West J . An estimate of the global burden of anthropogenic ozone and fine particulate matter on premature human mortality using atmospheric modeling. Environ Health Perspect. 2010; 118(9):1189-95. PMC: 2944076. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0901220. View

5.
Krewski D, Jerrett M, Burnett R, Ma R, Hughes E, Shi Y . Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009; (140):5-114. View