» Articles » PMID: 35161550

A RULA-Based Comparison of the Ergonomic Risk of Typical Working Procedures for Dentists and Dental Assistants of General Dentistry, Endodontology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, and Orthodontics

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 Feb 15
PMID 35161550
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In general, the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD) in dentistry is high, and dental assistants (DA) are even more affected than dentists (D). Furthermore, differentiations between the fields of dental specialization (e.g., general dentistry, endodontology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, or orthodontics) are rare. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the ergonomic risk of the aforementioned four fields of dental specialization for D and DA on the one hand, and to compare the ergonomic risk of D and DA within each individual field of dental specialization.

Methods: In total, 60 dentists (33 male/27 female) and 60 dental assistants (11 male/49 female) volunteered in this study. The sample was composed of 15 dentists and 15 dental assistants from each of the dental field, in order to represent the fields of dental specialization. In a laboratory setting, all tasks were recorded using an inertial motion capture system. The kinematic data were applied to an automated version of the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA).

Results: The results revealed significantly reduced ergonomic risks in endodontology and orthodontics compared to oral and maxillofacial surgery and general dentistry in DAs, while orthodontics showed a significantly reduced ergonomic risk compared to general dentistry in Ds. Further differences between the fields of dental specialization were found in the right wrist, right lower arm, and left lower arm in DAs and in the neck, right wrist, right lower arm, and left wrist in Ds. The differences between Ds and DAs within a specialist discipline were rather small.

Discussion: Independent of whether one works as a D or DA, the percentage of time spent working in higher risk scores is reduced in endodontologists, and especially in orthodontics, compared to general dentists or oral and maxillofacial surgeons. In order to counteract the development of WMSD, early intervention should be made. Consequently, ergonomic training or strength training is recommended.

Citing Articles

Posture analysis during tooth extraction.

Fukushima T, Sugahara K, Ito K, Koyachi M, Nishiyama A, Kurihara C BDJ Open. 2025; 11(1):16.

PMID: 39962108 PMC: 11832760. DOI: 10.1038/s41405-025-00311-1.


Effect of fence tray matching care on excess adhesive and bracket placement accuracy for orthodontic bonding: an in vitro study.

Hu M, Cao Y, Wu X, Jiang Q, Zhu F BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):555.

PMID: 38735948 PMC: 11089685. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04348-w.


Ergonomic Analysis of Dental Work in Different Oral Quadrants: A Motion Capture Preliminary Study among Endodontists.

Feige S, Holzgreve F, Fraeulin L, Maurer-Grubinger C, Betz W, Erbe C Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(4).

PMID: 38671821 PMC: 11048138. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11040400.


Ergonomic interventions and endodontic treatment outcomes: An analysis of dentist working posture and error rates.

Ratushnyi R, Stakhanska O Saudi Dent J. 2024; 36(3):466-470.

PMID: 38525173 PMC: 10960123. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.12.006.


Wearables for Monitoring and Postural Feedback in the Work Context: A Scoping Review.

Figueira V, Silva S, Costa I, Campos B, Salgado J, Pinho L Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(4).

PMID: 38400498 PMC: 10893004. DOI: 10.3390/s24041341.


References
1.
Zhang J, Novak A, Brouwer B, Li Q . Concurrent validation of Xsens MVN measurement of lower limb joint angular kinematics. Physiol Meas. 2013; 34(8):N63-9. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/34/8/N63. View

2.
Gandolfi M, Zamparini F, Spinelli A, Risi A, Prati C . Musculoskeletal Disorders among Italian Dentists and Dental Hygienists. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(5). PMC: 7967428. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052705. View

3.
Blume K, Holzgreve F, Fraeulin L, Erbe C, Betz W, Wanke E . Ergonomic Risk Assessment of Dental Students-RULA Applied to Objective Kinematic Data. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(19). PMC: 8508251. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph181910550. View

4.
Ohlendorf D, Naser A, Haas Y, Haenel J, Fraeulin L, Holzgreve F . Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders among Dentists and Dental Students in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(23). PMC: 7727829. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17238740. View

5.
Brown J, Burke F, Macdonald E, Gilmour H, Hill K, Morris A . Dental practitioners and ill health retirement: causes, outcomes and re-employment. Br Dent J. 2010; 209(5):E7. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.813. View