» Articles » PMID: 35154121

Immunogenomic Landscape in Breast Cancer Reveals Immunotherapeutically Relevant Gene Signatures

Overview
Journal Front Immunol
Date 2022 Feb 14
PMID 35154121
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Breast cancer is characterized by some types of heterogeneity, high aggressive behaviour, and low immunotherapeutic efficiency. Detailed immune stratification is a prerequisite for interpreting resistance to treatment and escape from immune control. Hence, the immune landscape of breast cancer needs further understanding. We systematically clustered breast cancer into six immune subtypes based on the mRNA expression patterns of immune signatures and comprehensively depicted their characteristics. The immunotherapeutic benefit score (ITBscore) was validated to be a superior predictor of the response to immunotherapy in cohorts from various datasets. Six distinct immune subtypes related to divergences in biological functions, signatures of immune or stromal cells, extent of the adaptive immune response, genomic events, and clinical prognostication were identified. These six subtypes were characterized as immunologically quiet, chemokine dominant, lymphocyte depleted, wounding dominant, innate immune dominant, and IFN-γ dominant and exhibited features of the tumor microenvironment (TME). The high ITBscore subgroup, characterized by a high proportion of M1 macrophages:M2 macrophages, an activated inflammatory response, and increased mutational burden (such as mutations in TP53, CDH1 and CENPE), indicated better immunotherapeutic benefits. A low proportion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and an inadequate response to immune treatment were associated with the low ITBscore subgroup, which was also associated with poor survival. Analyses of four cohorts treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) suggested that patients with a high ITBscore received significant therapeutic advantages and clinical benefits. Our work may facilitate the understanding of immune phenotypes in shaping different TME landscapes and guide precision immuno-oncology and immunotherapy strategies.

Citing Articles

Development of a tertiary lymphoid structure-based prognostic model for breast cancer: integrating single-cell sequencing and machine learning to enhance patient outcomes.

Zhang X, Li L, Shi X, Zhao Y, Cai Z, Ni N Front Immunol. 2025; 16:1534928.

PMID: 40078998 PMC: 11897234. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1534928.


Integrative machine learning model of RNA modifications predict prognosis and treatment response in patients with breast cancer.

Wang T, Wang S, Li Z, Xie J, Jia Q, Hou J Cancer Cell Int. 2025; 25(1):43.

PMID: 39948551 PMC: 11827143. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-025-03651-y.


Epigenetic profiling for prognostic stratification and personalized therapy in breast cancer.

Guo X, Feng C, Xing J, Cao Y, Liu T, Yang W Front Immunol. 2025; 15:1510829.

PMID: 39877345 PMC: 11772270. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1510829.


Evaluating the prognostic potential of telomerase signature in breast cancer through advanced machine learning model.

Guo X, Cao Y, Shi X, Xing J, Feng C, Wang T Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1462953.

PMID: 39669558 PMC: 11634871. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1462953.


Machine learning based anoikis signature predicts personalized treatment strategy of breast cancer.

Guo X, Xing J, Cao Y, Yang W, Shi X, Mu R Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1491508.

PMID: 39650663 PMC: 11621045. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1491508.


References
1.
Schreiber R, Old L, Smyth M . Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity's roles in cancer suppression and promotion. Science. 2011; 331(6024):1565-70. DOI: 10.1126/science.1203486. View

2.
Panda A, Mehnert J, Hirshfield K, Riedlinger G, Damare S, Saunders T . Immune Activation and Benefit From Avelumab in EBV-Positive Gastric Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017; 110(3):316-320. PMC: 6658862. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx213. View

3.
Rooney M, Shukla S, Wu C, Getz G, Hacohen N . Molecular and genetic properties of tumors associated with local immune cytolytic activity. Cell. 2015; 160(1-2):48-61. PMC: 4856474. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.033. View

4.
Scrucca L, Fop M, Murphy T, Raftery A . mclust 5: Clustering, Classification and Density Estimation Using Gaussian Finite Mixture Models. R J. 2016; 8(1):289-317. PMC: 5096736. View

5.
Yates L, Gerstung M, Knappskog S, Desmedt C, Gundem G, Van Loo P . Subclonal diversification of primary breast cancer revealed by multiregion sequencing. Nat Med. 2015; 21(7):751-9. PMC: 4500826. DOI: 10.1038/nm.3886. View