» Articles » PMID: 35150150

Activity of Decitabine As Maintenance Therapy in Core Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Abstract

Background: Posttherapy measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is associated with shorter relapse-free survival (RFS). Elimination of MRD measured via quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRTPCR) for disease specific transcripts can potentially lead to better outcomes in CBF-AML.

Methods: We prospectively monitored the MRD using qRTPCR and flow cytometry on bone marrow samples in patients with newly diagnosed CBF-AML who received decitabine (DAC) maintenance therapy after fludarabine/cytarabine/G-CSF (FLAG)-based induction/consolidation regimen. Negative qRTPCR (CMR) was defined as fusion transcript <0.01%.

Results: Thirty-one patients with CBF-AML including 14 with t(8;21) and 17 with inv(16) received parenteral DAC as maintenance therapy. Fifteen patients (48.3%) had completed FLAG-based induction/consolidation but with positive MRD (0.35%, range = 0.01%-0.91%) (Group 1). Sixteen patients (51.7%) could not complete recommended consolidations with FLAG-based regimen (due to older age or complications) and were switched to DAC maintenance (Group 2). In Group 2, eight patients (50%) had undetectable MRD (Group 2A) (all had qRTPCR ≤ 0.01%) and the other eight patients (50%) had residual fusion product by qRTPCR (0.1%, range = 0.02%-0.36%) (Group 2B) prior to starting DAC. Amongst the 23 patients who had a PCR ≥ 0.01% before maintenance therapy (Groups 1 and 2B), 12 patients (52%) attained a CMR as their best response (responders). The median pre-DAC qRTPCR amongst responders were 0.03% compared to 0.14% in nonresponders (p = .002). The median estimated molecular RFS amongst responders were 93.9 months. At a median follow-up of 59.3 months (13.2-106 months) from DAC initiation, 16 patients (51.6%) had to be initiated on a second line of therapy (40%, 25%, and 100% patients, respectively, in Groups1, 2A, and 2B). The median estimated time to new treatment between responders was 112.4 versus 5.8 months in nonresponders (hazard ratio = 0.16, 95% confidence interval = 0.04-0.54); however, there were no difference in overall survival between these groups (p = .37).

Conclusion: DAC is an effective maintenance therapy for CBF-AML patients with persistent fusion transcript at a low level after FLAG-based regimen. Attainment of CMR with DAC maintenance can lead to long-term remission in patients who have persistent MRD positive after FLAG-based regimen or are unable to receive the full course of consolidation therapy.

Citing Articles

DNMT3A loss drives a HIF-1-dependent synthetic lethality to HDAC6 inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer.

Zhang J, Zhao Y, Liang R, Zhou X, Wang Z, Yang C Acta Pharm Sin B. 2025; 14(12):5219-5234.

PMID: 39807333 PMC: 11725086. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2024.08.025.


Genomic profiles and outcomes in de novo versus therapy-related core binding factor AML.

Chiu M, Schimmer A, Schuh A, Bankar A, Richard-Carpentier G, Sibai H Blood Cancer J. 2024; 14(1):190.

PMID: 39482301 PMC: 11528045. DOI: 10.1038/s41408-024-01166-9.


Trends in allogeneic transplantation for favorable risk acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: a longitudinal study of >15 years from the ALWP of the EBMT.

Nagler A, Labopin M, Salmenniemi U, Wu D, Blaise D, Rambaldi A Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024; 59(11):1563-1576.

PMID: 39164484 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-024-02379-z.


Hypomethylating agent monotherapy in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: a French multicentric retrospective study.

Gabellier L, Peterlin P, Thepot S, Hicheri Y, Paul F, Gallego-Hernanz M Ann Hematol. 2024; 103(3):759-769.

PMID: 38273140 PMC: 10867066. DOI: 10.1007/s00277-024-05623-0.


Efficacy of venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents in young, and unfit patients with newly diagnosed core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

Zhang K, Zhang X, Xu Y, Xue S, Qiu H, Tang X Blood Cancer J. 2023; 13(1):155.

PMID: 37821435 PMC: 10567686. DOI: 10.1038/s41408-023-00928-1.


References
1.
Luthra R, Patel K, Reddy N, Haghshenas V, Routbort M, Harmon M . Next-generation sequencing-based multigene mutational screening for acute myeloid leukemia using MiSeq: applicability for diagnostics and disease monitoring. Haematologica. 2013; 99(3):465-73. PMC: 3943309. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2013.093765. View

2.
Borthakur G, Kantarjian H . Core binding factor acute myelogenous leukemia-2021 treatment algorithm. Blood Cancer J. 2021; 11(6):114. PMC: 8209225. DOI: 10.1038/s41408-021-00503-6. View

3.
Perea G, Lasa A, Aventin A, Domingo A, Villamor N, de Llano M . Prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with favorable cytogenetics [t(8;21) and inv(16)]. Leukemia. 2005; 20(1):87-94. DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404015. View

4.
Kroeger H, Jelinek J, Estecio M, He R, Kondo K, Chung W . Aberrant CpG island methylation in acute myeloid leukemia is accentuated at relapse. Blood. 2008; 112(4):1366-73. PMC: 2515110. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-11-126227. View

5.
Bloomfield C, Lawrence D, Byrd J, Carroll A, Pettenati M, Tantravahi R . Frequency of prolonged remission duration after high-dose cytarabine intensification in acute myeloid leukemia varies by cytogenetic subtype. Cancer Res. 1998; 58(18):4173-9. View