Catheter Ablation for Papillary Muscle Arrhythmias: A Systematic Review
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Catheter ablation of papillary muscle ventricular arrhythmias (PM-VAs) has been associated with unsatisfactory results. Features that may affect acute and long-term procedural outcomes are not well established.
Objective: To systematically review the available data in the literature assessing efficacy and safety of PM-VAs catheter ablation.
Methods: An online search of PubMed, Cochrane Registry, Web of Science, Scopus and EMBASE libraries (from inception to March 1, 2021) was performed, in addition to manual screening. Twenty-one observational noncontrolled case-series were considered eligible for the systematic review, including 536 patients.
Results: Postero-medial PM harbored 60.8% of PM-VAs, while antero-lateral PM and right ventricular PMs 34.9% and 4.3% of cases, respectively. The mean acute success rate of the index ablation procedure was 88.1% (95% CI 82.8% to 91.9%, p < .001, I 0%). After a mean follow-up period of 15.5 ± 17.4 months, pooled long-term arrhythmia-free rate was 69.2%, while the pooled long-term success rate after multiple ablation procedure was 84.9%. Overall, procedure complications occurred in nine patients (1.7%) and no procedure-related deaths were reported. The use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) as well as contact force sensing (CFS) and irrigated catheters during ablation was associated with higher rates of arrhythmia-freedom at long-term follow-up.
Conclusions: Catheter ablation is an effective and safe strategy for PM-VAs, with an acute success rate of 88.1%, a long-term success rate of 69.2%, with a relatively low procedural complication rate. The use of ICE, irrigated catheters and catheters with CFS capability was associated with higher rates of arrhythmia-freedom at long-term follow-up.
Maslova V, Demming T, Moser F, Krueger R, Frank D, Lian E HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2024; 10(11):839-842.
PMID: 39664657 PMC: 11628808. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2024.08.009.
Robotics, remote medicine, AI: Oh my!.
Weiss J HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2024; 10(5):310-311.
PMID: 38799599 PMC: 11116963. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2024.01.011.
Nies M, Watanabe K, Kawamura I, Santos-Gallego C, Reddy V, Koruth J Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024; 17(6):e012734.
PMID: 38753535 PMC: 11186713. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012734.
Jiang Z, Guo C, Liu Q, Tian Y, Tian L, Yang Y BMJ Open. 2024; 14(2):e081815.
PMID: 38382956 PMC: 10882318. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081815.
Velagic V, Mugnai G, Prepolec I, Pasara V, Milinkovic A, Nekic A Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2023; 21(1):20.
PMID: 37880719 PMC: 10601175. DOI: 10.1186/s12947-023-00318-4.