» Articles » PMID: 35135364

Determinants of Emotional Intimate Partner Violence Against Women and Girls with Children in Mexican Households: An Ecological Framework

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2022 Feb 9
PMID 35135364
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify the risk factors for emotional intimate partner violence (IPV) against women and girls with children in Mexico from an ecological perspective. To that end, we generate a dataset with 35,004 observations and 42 covariates, to which we apply an additive probit model estimated with a boosting algorithm to overcome high-dimensionality and simultaneously perform variable selection and model choice. The dataset integrates 10 information sources, allowing us to properly characterize the four levels of the ecological approach, which is the first contribution of this paper. In addition, there are three key contributions. First, we identify a number of factors significantly linked to emotional IPV against women with children: age, age at sexual initiation, age at marriage (or cohabitation), autonomy regarding professional issues, social support networks, division of housework, the community's Gini index, women's economic participation in the municipality, and the prevalence of crime against males in the region. Second, we discuss some risk factors whose effects have not been examined or have been underexplored for Mexico; these include women's decision-making autonomy, social support networks, distribution of housework, the community's economic inequality, and criminality. Third, we identify specific risk subgroups that are generally overlooked: women who had their first sexual intercourse during childhood and women who got married (or moved in together with a partner) late in life. The main results suggest that strategies aiming to promote women's social and economic empowerment and reduce criminality should also incorporate a gender component regarding emotional violence against women with children in the context of intimate relationships.

Citing Articles

How does empowering men affect intimate partner violence? Evidence from Bangladesh.

Francis-Tan A SSM Popul Health. 2024; 26:101656.

PMID: 38544696 PMC: 10965466. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101656.


Verbal and psychological violence against women in Turkey and its determinants.

Alkan O, Sercemeli C, Ozmen K PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0275950.

PMID: 36215284 PMC: 9550074. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275950.

References
1.
Gashaw B, Schei B, Magnus J . Social ecological factors and intimate partner violence in pregnancy. PLoS One. 2018; 13(3):e0194681. PMC: 5875784. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194681. View

2.
Stockl H, March L, Pallitto C, Garcia-Moreno C . Intimate partner violence among adolescents and young women: prevalence and associated factors in nine countries: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14:751. PMC: 4133076. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-751. View

3.
Voith L, Azen R, Qin W . Social Capital Effects on the Relation between Neighborhood Characteristics and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization among Women. J Urban Health. 2020; 98(1):91-100. PMC: 7873180. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-020-00475-1. View

4.
Valdez-Santiago R, Hijar M, Rojas Martinez R, Avila Burgos L, Arenas Monreal M . Prevalence and severity of intimate partner violence in women living in eight indigenous regions of Mexico. Soc Sci Med. 2013; 82:51-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.016. View

5.
Abramsky T, Lees S, Stockl H, Harvey S, Kapinga I, Ranganathan M . Women's income and risk of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from the MAISHA cluster randomised trial in North-Western Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):1108. PMC: 6694529. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7454-1. View