» Articles » PMID: 32996025

Social Capital Effects on the Relation Between Neighborhood Characteristics and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Among Women

Overview
Journal J Urban Health
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Sep 30
PMID 32996025
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) remains a public health issue plaguing families and communities in the USA. Despite considerable research devoted to individual-level factors affecting IPV and a smaller body of ecological IPV research, few studies explore the interaction between individual-level protective factors and neighborhood- or community-level factors in predicting the incidents of IPV among women. Moreover, most IPV studies utilize a unidimensional approach for social capital, despite strong empirical and theoretical support for a multi-dimensional conceptualization. In a sample of heterosexual women in the USA (N = 1884), we found that concentrated disadvantage, social and physical disorder, and community violence together significantly predicted increased rates of IPV victimization. Concentrated disadvantage and higher scores on the social capital index independently predicted a lower probability of victimization. Moderating effects were found for social capital: the protective effects of social capital on the probability of IPV were attenuated for those reporting community violence compared with women who did not report it. These findings enhance the field's understanding of the synergistic relationship between individual- and neighborhood-level factors, providing important implications for community-based IPV interventions.

Citing Articles

The association between perceived neighborhood social cohesion and intimate partner violence in a refugee camp in Dollo Ado, Ethiopia.

Astatke R, Woldegiorgis T, Scott J, Prata N, Harley K, Deyessa N Confl Health. 2025; 19(1):1.

PMID: 39762880 PMC: 11702093. DOI: 10.1186/s13031-024-00637-x.


Determinants of Emotional Intimate Partner Violence against Women and Girls with Children in Mexican Households: An Ecological Framework.

Munguia J, Martinez-Zarzoso I J Interpers Violence. 2022; 37(23-24):NP22704-NP22731.

PMID: 35135364 PMC: 9679571. DOI: 10.1177/08862605211072179.

References
1.
Stueve A, ODonnell L . Urban young women's experiences of discrimination and community violence and intimate partner violence. J Urban Health. 2008; 85(3):386-401. PMC: 2329753. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-008-9265-z. View

2.
Tung E, Johnson T, ONeal Y, Steenes A, Caraballo G, Peek M . Experiences of Community Violence Among Adults with Chronic Conditions: Qualitative Findings from Chicago. J Gen Intern Med. 2018; 33(11):1913-1920. PMC: 6206331. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4607-3. View

3.
Sugg N . Intimate partner violence: prevalence, health consequences, and intervention. Med Clin North Am. 2015; 99(3):629-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2015.01.012. View

4.
Beyer K, Layde P, Hamberger L, Laud P . Does neighborhood environment differentiate intimate partner femicides from other femicides?. Violence Against Women. 2014; 21(1):49-64. PMC: 4500151. DOI: 10.1177/1077801214564075. View

5.
Wilkins N, Myers L, Kuehl T, Bauman A, Hertz M . Connecting the Dots: State Health Department Approaches to Addressing Shared Risk and Protective Factors Across Multiple Forms of Violence. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017; :S32-S41. PMC: 5815838. DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000669. View