» Articles » PMID: 35127774

From Active to Non-active Giant Cell Arteritis: Longitudinal Monitoring of Patients on Glucocorticoid Therapy in Combination With Leflunomide

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Feb 7
PMID 35127774
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the present study, we longitudinally monitored leukocyte subsets, expression of neutrophil surface adhesion molecules (CD62L and CD11b) and serum analytes in therapy-naïve patients with active giant cell arteritis (GCA). We collected blood samples at the baseline, and at weeks 1, 4, 12, 24, and 48 of follow-up, and evaluated short- and long-term effects of glucocorticoids (GC) vs. GC and leflunomide. Our aim was to identify candidate biomarkers that could be used to monitor disease activity and predict an increased risk of a relapse. Following high doses of GC, the numbers of CD4+ T-lymphocytes and B-lymphocytes transiently increased and then subsided when GC dose tapering started at week 4. In contrast, the numbers of neutrophils significantly increased during the follow-up time of 12 weeks compared to pre-treatment time. Neutrophil CD62L rapidly diminished after initiation of GC therapy, however its expression remained low at week 48, only in patients under combinatorial therapy with leflunomide. Levels of acute phase reactant SAA and IL-6 decreased significantly after treatment with GC and leflunomide, while levels of IL-8, IL-18, and CHI3L1 did not change significantly during the follow-up period. CHI3L1 was associated with signs of transmural inflammation and vessel occlusion and might therefore serve as a marker of fully developed active GCA, and a promising therapeutic target. Patients with relapses had higher levels of IL-23 at presentation than patients without relapses ( = 0.021). Additionally, the levels of IL-23 were higher at the time of relapse compared to the last follow-up point before relapse. IL-23 might present a promising biomarker of uncontrolled and active disease and could give early indication of upcoming relapses.

Citing Articles

New blood biomarkers and imaging for disease stratification and monitoring of giant cell arteritis.

Tomelleri A, Dejaco C RMD Open. 2024; 10(1).

PMID: 38395453 PMC: 10895233. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003397.


Giant Cell Arteritis: Advances in Understanding Pathogenesis and Implications for Clinical Practice.

Paroli M, Caccavale R, Accapezzato D Cells. 2024; 13(3.

PMID: 38334659 PMC: 10855045. DOI: 10.3390/cells13030267.


Biomarkers in the era of targeted therapy in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: is it possible to replace acute-phase reactants?.

Carvajal Alegria G, Nicolas M, van Sleen Y Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1202160.

PMID: 37398679 PMC: 10313393. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1202160.


Measuring treatment outcomes and change in disease activity in giant cell arteritis: a systematic literature review informing the development of the EULAR-ACR response criteria on behalf of the EULAR-ACR response criteria in giant cell arteritis....

Sanchez-Alvarez C, Bond M, Soowamber M, Camellino D, Anderson M, Langford C RMD Open. 2023; 9(2).

PMID: 37349123 PMC: 10314653. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003233.


Serum proteomics in giant cell arteritis in response to a three-day pulse of glucocorticoid followed by tocilizumab monotherapy (the GUSTO trial).

Christ L, Gloor A, Kollert F, Gaber T, Buttgereit F, Reichenbach S Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1165758.

PMID: 37287970 PMC: 10242646. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1165758.

References
1.
Mus A, Cornelissen F, Asmawidjaja P, van Hamburg J, Boon L, Hendriks R . Interleukin-23 promotes Th17 differentiation by inhibiting T-bet and FoxP3 and is required for elevation of interleukin-22, but not interleukin-21, in autoimmune experimental arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010; 62(4):1043-50. DOI: 10.1002/art.27336. View

2.
Chong A, Rezai K, Gebel H, Finnegan A, Foster P, Xu X . Effects of leflunomide and other immunosuppressive agents on T cell proliferation in vitro. Transplantation. 1996; 61(1):140-5. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199601150-00026. View

3.
Restuccia G, Boiardi L, Cavazza A, Catanoso M, Macchioni P, Muratore F . Flares in Biopsy-Proven Giant Cell Arteritis in Northern Italy: Characteristics and Predictors in a Long-Term Follow-Up Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(19):e3524. PMC: 4902491. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003524. View

4.
Kermani T, Schmidt J, Crowson C, Ytterberg S, Hunder G, Matteson E . Utility of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011; 41(6):866-71. PMC: 3307891. DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2011.10.005. View

5.
Camellino D, Matteson E, Buttgereit F, Dejaco C . Monitoring and long-term management of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020; 16(9):481-495. DOI: 10.1038/s41584-020-0458-5. View