» Articles » PMID: 35125812

Deep Learning Model Improves Radiologists' Performance in Detection and Classification of Breast Lesions

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Feb 7
PMID 35125812
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Computer-aided diagnosis using deep learning algorithms has been initially applied in the field of mammography, but there is no large-scale clinical application.

Methods: This study proposed to develop and verify an artificial intelligence model based on mammography. Firstly, mammograms retrospectively collected from six centers were randomized to a training dataset and a validation dataset for establishing the model. Secondly, the model was tested by comparing 12 radiologists' performance with and without it. Finally, prospectively enrolled women with mammograms from six centers were diagnosed by radiologists with the model. The detection and diagnostic capabilities were evaluated using the free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) curve and ROC curve.

Results: The sensitivity of model for detecting lesions after matching was 0.908 for false positive rate of 0.25 in unilateral images. The area under ROC curve (AUC) to distinguish the benign lesions from malignant lesions was 0.855 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.830, 0.880]. The performance of 12 radiologists with the model was higher than that of radiologists alone (AUC: 0.852 . 0.805, P=0.005). The mean reading time of with the model was shorter than that of reading alone (80.18 s . 62.28 s, P=0.032). In prospective application, the sensitivity of detection reached 0.887 at false positive rate of 0.25; the AUC of radiologists with the model was 0.983 (95% CI: 0.978, 0.988), with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.36%, 98.07%, 87.76%, and 99.09%, respectively.

Conclusions: The artificial intelligence model exhibits high accuracy for detecting and diagnosing breast lesions, improves diagnostic accuracy and saves time.

Citing Articles

Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Global Breast Cancer Care: A Scoping Review of Applications, Outcomes, and Challenges.

Chia J, He G, Ngiam K, Hartman M, Ng Q, Goh S Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39857979 PMC: 11764353. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020197.


CNN-Based Cross-Modality Fusion for Enhanced Breast Cancer Detection Using Mammography and Ultrasound.

Wang Y, Wang C, Liu K, Huang Y, Chen T, Chiu K Tomography. 2024; 10(12):2038-2057.

PMID: 39728907 PMC: 11679931. DOI: 10.3390/tomography10120145.


Impact of human and artificial intelligence collaboration on workload reduction in medical image interpretation.

Chen M, Wang Y, Wang Q, Shi J, Wang H, Ye Z NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):349.

PMID: 39616244 PMC: 11608314. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01328-w.


Artificial intelligence in mammography: a systematic review of the external validation.

Branco P, Franco A, de Oliveira A, Carneiro I, de Carvalho L, de Souza J Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024; 46.

PMID: 39380589 PMC: 11460423. DOI: 10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo71.


Deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis system for the automatic detection and classification of lateral cervical lymph nodes on original ultrasound images of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a prospective diagnostic study.

Yuan Y, Pan B, Mo H, Wu X, Long Z, Yang Z Endocrine. 2024; 85(3):1289-1299.

PMID: 38570388 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-024-03808-1.


References
1.
Taylor P, Potts H . Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate. Eur J Cancer. 2008; 44(6):798-807. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.02.016. View

2.
Chan H, Doi K, Galhotra S, Vyborny C, Macmahon H, Jokich P . Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. Med Phys. 1987; 14(4):538-48. DOI: 10.1118/1.596065. View

3.
Kooi T, Litjens G, van Ginneken B, Gubern-Merida A, Sanchez C, Mann R . Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions. Med Image Anal. 2016; 35:303-312. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2016.07.007. View

4.
Elmore J, Nakano C, Koepsell T, Desnick L, DOrsi C, Ransohoff D . International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003; 95(18):1384-93. PMC: 3146363. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djg048. View

5.
Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa R, Ko J, Swetter S, Blau H . Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017; 542(7639):115-118. PMC: 8382232. DOI: 10.1038/nature21056. View