» Articles » PMID: 21232681

Power Estimation for Multireader ROC Methods an Updated and Unified Approach

Overview
Journal Acad Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2011 Jan 15
PMID 21232681
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale And Objectives: We describe a step-by-step procedure for estimating power and sample size for planned multireader receiver operating characteristic (ROC) studies that will be analyzed using either the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz (DBM) or Obuchowski-Rockette (OR) method. This procedure updates previous approaches by incorporating recent methodological developments and unifies the approaches by allowing inputs to be conjectured parameter values or outputs from either a DBM or OR pilot-study analysis.

Materials And Methods: Power computations are described in a step-by-step procedure and the theoretical basis for the procedure is described. Updates include using the currently recommended denominator degrees of freedom, accounting for different pilot and planned study normal-to-abnormal case ratios, and a new method for computing the OR test-by-reader variance component.

Results: Using a real dataset we illustrate how to compute the power for two planned studies, one having the same normal-to-abnormal case ratio as the pilot study and the other having a different ratio. In a simulation study, we show that the proposed procedure gives mean power estimates close to the true power.

Conclusions: Application of the updated procedure is straightforward. It is important that pilot data be comparable to the planned study with respect to the modalities, reader expertise, and case selection. Variability of the power estimates warrants further investigation.

Citing Articles

Enhancing Radiologist Reading Performance by Ordering Screening Mammograms Based on Characteristics That Promote Visual Adaptation.

Gommers J, Verboom S, Duvivier K, van Rooden J, van Raamt A, Houwers J Radiology. 2024; 313(1):e240237.

PMID: 39377678 PMC: 11535868. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.240237.


An alternative parameterization for the binormal ROC curve, with applications to sizing and simulation studies.

Hillis S Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2024; 12929.

PMID: 39006765 PMC: 11243637. DOI: 10.1117/12.3008642.


An ASER AI/ML expert panel formative user research study for an interpretable interactive splenic AAST grading graphical user interface prototype.

Sarkar N, Kumagai M, Meyr S, Pothapragada S, Unberath M, Li G Emerg Radiol. 2024; 31(2):167-178.

PMID: 38302827 PMC: 11257379. DOI: 10.1007/s10140-024-02202-8.


Relationship between Obuchowski-Rockette-Hillis and Gallas methods for analyzing multi-reader diagnostic imaging data with empirical AUC as the reader performance measure.

Hillis S Biostat Epidemiol. 2023; 7(1).

PMID: 37719421 PMC: 10500550. DOI: 10.1080/24709360.2022.2062115.


3D-printed Magnetic Resonance (MR)-based gynecological phantom for image-guided brachytherapy training.

Kut C, Kao T, Morcos M, Kim Y, Boctor E, Viswanathan A Brachytherapy. 2022; 21(6):799-805.

PMID: 36050143 PMC: 10810234. DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.07.005.


References
1.
Obuchowski N . Multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic curve studies: hypothesis testing and sample size estimation using an analysis of variance approach with dependent observations. Acad Radiol. 1995; 2 Suppl 1:S22-9; discussion S57-64, S70-1 pas. View

2.
Hillis S, Berbaum K . Power estimation for the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method. Acad Radiol. 2004; 11(11):1260-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.08.009. View

3.
Chakraborty D . Prediction accuracy of a sample-size estimation method for ROC studies. Acad Radiol. 2010; 17(5):628-38. PMC: 2867097. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.01.007. View

4.
Hillis S, Obuchowski N, Schartz K, Berbaum K . A comparison of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz and Obuchowski-Rockette methods for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data. Stat Med. 2005; 24(10):1579-607. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2024. View

5.
Hillis S . A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom methods for multiple observer ROC analysis. Stat Med. 2006; 26(3):596-619. PMC: 1769324. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2532. View