» Articles » PMID: 35123526

FCTC Ratification, Smoking Prevalence, and GDP Per Capita: Lessons for Indonesia and the Rest of the World

Overview
Journal Global Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Feb 6
PMID 35123526
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Indonesia's stagnated progress towards tobacco control could be addressed through the implementation of a comprehensive national framework, such as the World Health Organization's (WHO) Framework Convention of Tobacco Control (FCTC). However, national tobacco industry supporters argue that accepting the FCTC will have negative economic implications for the country. These arguments have, thus far, discouraged the Indonesian government from ratifying the FCTC. Drawing from an analysis of the impact of the FCTC on other countries' smoking rates and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, this study offers empirical evidence against industry arguments concerning the potential negative economic impacts of FCTC adoption. This study applies a two stage least square estimation strategy to unbalanced panel data at country level. In the first stage we estimate the impact of FCTC ratification on smoking rates, and in the second step, we estimate the influence of smoking activity on macroeconomic performance.

Results: The result of this study shows that FCTC ratification has a negative impact on a country's smoking prevalence. While FCTC ratification positively correlates with reduced smoking prevalence, a decline in smoking prevalence is not related to a decline in GDP per capita.

Conclusions: The results of this study shows that FCTC ratification, which can be an important driver for more effective tobacco control, does not necessarily have a negative impact on the economy. Instead, FCTC ratification may be beneficial for both health and economic outcomes, as it provides comprehensive guidance for reducing smoking prevalence that take into account social and economic factors.

Citing Articles

Trends in the prevalence and factors associated with indoor smoking in 24 countries Party to the WHO FCTC: implications for equitable policy implementation.

Odo D, Ayo-Yusuf O, Dinku Y, Mekonnen A, Maddox R BMJ Glob Health. 2025; 10(2).

PMID: 39939108 PMC: 11822386. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017110.


Assessing the Level of Poverty and Utilization of Government Social Programs Among Tobacco Farmers in Indonesia.

Sahadewo G, Lencucha R, Bandara S, Drope J, Witoelar F Nicotine Tob Res. 2024; 26(9):1132-1140.

PMID: 38456837 PMC: 11339166. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntae050.


Health taxes in Indonesia: a review of policy debates on the tobacco, alcoholic beverages and sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in the media.

Ahsan A, Amalia N, Rahmayanti K, Adani N, Wiyono N, Endawansa A BMJ Glob Health. 2023; 8(Suppl 8).

PMID: 37813444 PMC: 10565181. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012042.

References
1.
Anderson C, Becher H, Winkler V . Tobacco Control Progress in Low and Middle Income Countries in Comparison to High Income Countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016; 13(10). PMC: 5086778. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13101039. View

2.
Gravely S, Giovino G, Craig L, Commar A, Tursan dEspaignet E, Schotte K . Implementation of key demand-reduction measures of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and change in smoking prevalence in 126 countries: an association study. Lancet Public Health. 2017; 2(4):e166-e174. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30045-2. View

3.
Parrott S, Godfrey C . Economics of smoking cessation. BMJ. 2004; 328(7445):947-9. PMC: 390220. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7445.947. View

4.
Pinto M, Bardach A, Palacios A, Biz A, Alcaraz A, Rodriguez B . Burden of smoking in Brazil and potential benefit of increasing taxes on cigarettes for the economy and for reducing morbidity and mortality. Cad Saude Publica. 2019; 35(8):e00129118. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311X00129118. View

5.
Dubray J, Schwartz R, Chaiton M, OConnor S, Cohen J . The effect of MPOWER on smoking prevalence. Tob Control. 2014; 24(6):540-2. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051834. View