» Articles » PMID: 17610918

Raising Taxes to Reduce Smoking Prevalence in the US: a Simulation of the Anticipated Health and Economic Impacts

Overview
Journal Public Health
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Public Health
Date 2007 Jul 6
PMID 17610918
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To estimate health and economic outcomes of raising the excise taxes on cigarettes.

Methods: We use a dynamic computer simulation model to estimate health and economic impacts of raising taxes on cigarettes (up to 100% price increase) for the entire population of the USA over 20 years. We also perform sensitivity analysis on price elasticity.

Results: A 40% tax-induced cigarette price increase would reduce smoking prevalence from 21% in 2004 to 15.2% in 2025 with large gains in cumulative life years (7 million) and quality adjusted life years (13 million) over 20 years. Total tax revenue will increase by $365 billion in that span, and total smoking-related medical costs would drop by $317 billion, resulting in total savings of $682 billion. These benefits increase greatly with larger tax increases, and tax revenues continue to rise even as smoking prevalence falls.

Conclusions: Increasing taxes on cigarettes is a unique policy intervention that reduces smoking prevalence, generates additional tax revenue, and results in significant savings in medical care costs.

Citing Articles

Suicide mortality following the implementation of tobacco packaging and pricing policies in Korea: an interrupted time-series analysis.

Jin T, Seo J, Ye S, Lee S, Park E, Oh J BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):180.

PMID: 38679738 PMC: 11057188. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03372-5.


Systems Thinking and Complexity Science Methods and the Policy Process in Non-communicable Disease Prevention: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Clifford Astbury C, Lee K, McGill E, Clarke J, Egan M, Halloran A Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023; 12:6772.

PMID: 37579437 PMC: 10125079. DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6772.


Valuation of digital goods during the coronavirus outbreak in the United States.

Jamison M, Wang P Telecomm Policy. 2022; 45(5):102126.

PMID: 36568512 PMC: 9757922. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102126.


FCTC ratification, smoking prevalence, and GDP per capita: lessons for Indonesia and the rest of the world.

Ahsan A, Afin R, Amalia N, Hindriyani M, Jacinda A, Kramer E Global Health. 2022; 18(1):11.

PMID: 35123526 PMC: 8818242. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-022-00810-y.


Healthy People Countdown 2030: reaching 5% cigarette smoking prevalence among US adults through state cigarette excise tax increases.

Nargis N Tob Control. 2021; 32(3):388-392.

PMID: 34740954 PMC: 10176409. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056755.


References
1.
Ahmad S . The cost-effectiveness of raising the legal smoking age in California. Med Decis Making. 2005; 25(3):330-40. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X05276859. View

2.
Ross H, Chaloupka F . The effect of cigarette prices on youth smoking. Health Econ. 2003; 12(3):217-30. DOI: 10.1002/hec.709. View

3.
Ahmad S, Billimek J . Limiting youth access to tobacco: comparing the long-term health impacts of increasing cigarette excise taxes and raising the legal smoking age to 21 in the United States. Health Policy. 2006; 80(3):378-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.04.001. View

4.
Hodgson T . Cigarette smoking and lifetime medical expenditures. Milbank Q. 1992; 70(1):81-125. View

5.
Warner K, FULTON G, Nicolas P, Grimes D . Employment implications of declining tobacco product sales for the regional economies of the United States. JAMA. 1996; 275(16):1241-6. View