» Articles » PMID: 35113857

A Cortical Network Processes Auditory Error Signals During Human Speech Production to Maintain Fluency

Overview
Journal PLoS Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Feb 3
PMID 35113857
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hearing one's own voice is critical for fluent speech production as it allows for the detection and correction of vocalization errors in real time. This behavior known as the auditory feedback control of speech is impaired in various neurological disorders ranging from stuttering to aphasia; however, the underlying neural mechanisms are still poorly understood. Computational models of speech motor control suggest that, during speech production, the brain uses an efference copy of the motor command to generate an internal estimate of the speech output. When actual feedback differs from this internal estimate, an error signal is generated to correct the internal estimate and update necessary motor commands to produce intended speech. We were able to localize the auditory error signal using electrocorticographic recordings from neurosurgical participants during a delayed auditory feedback (DAF) paradigm. In this task, participants hear their voice with a time delay as they produced words and sentences (similar to an echo on a conference call), which is well known to disrupt fluency by causing slow and stutter-like speech in humans. We observed a significant response enhancement in auditory cortex that scaled with the duration of feedback delay, indicating an auditory speech error signal. Immediately following auditory cortex, dorsal precentral gyrus (dPreCG), a region that has not been implicated in auditory feedback processing before, exhibited a markedly similar response enhancement, suggesting a tight coupling between the 2 regions. Critically, response enhancement in dPreCG occurred only during articulation of long utterances due to a continuous mismatch between produced speech and reafferent feedback. These results suggest that dPreCG plays an essential role in processing auditory error signals during speech production to maintain fluency.

Citing Articles

Neural correlates of reading aloud on the autism spectrum.

McCabe C, Cahalan S, Pincus M, Rosenberg-Lee M, Graves W Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8240.

PMID: 40064934 PMC: 11894215. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88903-7.


Frequency-specific cortico-subcortical interaction in continuous speaking and listening.

Abbasi O, Steingraber N, Chalas N, Kluger D, Gross J Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39714917 PMC: 11666235. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.97083.


A corollary discharge circuit in human speech.

Khalilian-Gourtani A, Wang R, Chen X, Yu L, Dugan P, Friedman D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(50):e2404121121.

PMID: 39625978 PMC: 11648673. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2404121121.


Spatiotemporal Mapping of Auditory Onsets during Speech Production.

Kurteff G, Field A, Asghar S, Tyler-Kabara E, Clarke D, Weiner H J Neurosci. 2024; 44(47).

PMID: 39455254 PMC: 11580786. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1109-24.2024.


The Pattern and Staging of Brain Atrophy in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 (SCA2): MRI Volumetrics from ENIGMA-Ataxia.

Robertson J, Adanyeguh I, Bender B, Boesch S, Brunetti A, Cocozza S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39345594 PMC: 11429976. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.16.613281.


References
1.
Mukamel R, Gelbard H, Arieli A, Hasson U, Fried I, Malach R . Coupling between neuronal firing, field potentials, and FMRI in human auditory cortex. Science. 2005; 309(5736):951-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1110913. View

2.
Black J . The effect of delayed side-tone upon vocal rate and intensity. J Speech Disord. 1951; 16(1):56-60. DOI: 10.1044/jshd.1601.56. View

3.
Swink S, Stuart A . The effect of gender on the N1-P2 auditory complex while listening and speaking with altered auditory feedback. Brain Lang. 2012; 122(1):25-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.04.007. View

4.
Callan D, Jones J, Callan A . Multisensory and modality specific processing of visual speech in different regions of the premotor cortex. Front Psychol. 2014; 5:389. PMC: 4017150. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00389. View

5.
Stuart A, Kalinowski J, Rastatter M, Lynch K . Effect of delayed auditory feedback on normal speakers at two speech rates. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002; 111(5 Pt 1):2237-41. DOI: 10.1121/1.1466868. View