» Articles » PMID: 35108073

Quantification of Microtubule Stutters: Dynamic Instability Behaviors That Are Strongly Associated with Catastrophe

Abstract

Microtubules (MTs) are cytoskeletal fibers that undergo dynamic instability (DI), a remarkable process involving phases of growth and shortening separated by stochastic transitions called catastrophe and rescue. Dissecting DI mechanism(s) requires first characterizing and quantifying these dynamics, a subjective process that often ignores complexity in MT behavior. We present a tatistical ool for utomated ynamic nstability nalysis (STADIA) that identifies and quantifies not only growth and shortening, but also a category of intermediate behaviors that we term "stutters." During stutters, the rate of MT length change tends to be smaller in magnitude than during typical growth or shortening phases. Quantifying stutters and other behaviors with STADIA demonstrates that stutters precede most catastrophes in our in vitro experiments and dimer-scale MT simulations, suggesting that stutters are mechanistically involved in catastrophes. Related to this idea, we show that the anticatastrophe factor CLASP2γ works by promoting the return of stuttering MTs to growth. STADIA enables more comprehensive and data-driven analysis of MT dynamics compared with previous methods. The treatment of stutters as distinct and quantifiable DI behaviors provides new opportunities for analyzing mechanisms of MT dynamics and their regulation by binding proteins.

Citing Articles

EB3-informed dynamics of the microtubule stabilizing cap during stalled growth.

Kok M, Huber F, Kalisch S, Dogterom M Biophys J. 2024; 124(2):227-244.

PMID: 39604262 PMC: 11788501. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.11.3314.


The GTP-tubulin cap is not the determinant of microtubule end stability in cells.

Cassidy A, Farmer V, Arpag G, Zanic M Mol Biol Cell. 2024; 35(10):br19.

PMID: 39259768 PMC: 11481695. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E24-07-0307.


Interface-acting nucleotide controls polymerization dynamics at microtubule plus- and minus-ends.

McCormick L, Cleary J, Hancock W, Rice L Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 38180336 PMC: 10945504. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.89231.


Mechanical coupling coordinates microtubule growth.

Leeds B, Kostello K, Liu Y, Nelson C, Biggins S, Asbury C Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 38150374 PMC: 10752587. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.89467.


Mechanical coupling coordinates microtubule growth.

Leeds B, Kostello K, Liu Y, Nelson C, Biggins S, Asbury C bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37905093 PMC: 10614740. DOI: 10.1101/2023.06.29.547092.


References
1.
Fees C, Estrem C, Moore J . High-resolution Imaging and Analysis of Individual Astral Microtubule Dynamics in Budding Yeast. J Vis Exp. 2017; (122). PMC: 5462104. DOI: 10.3791/55610. View

2.
Castoldi M, Popov A . Purification of brain tubulin through two cycles of polymerization-depolymerization in a high-molarity buffer. Protein Expr Purif. 2003; 32(1):83-8. DOI: 10.1016/S1046-5928(03)00218-3. View

3.
Margolin G, Gregoretti I, Cickovski T, Li C, Shi W, Alber M . The mechanisms of microtubule catastrophe and rescue: implications from analysis of a dimer-scale computational model. Mol Biol Cell. 2011; 23(4):642-56. PMC: 3279392. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E11-08-0688. View

4.
Mitchison T, Kirschner M . Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature. 1984; 312(5991):237-42. DOI: 10.1038/312237a0. View

5.
Hyman A, Salser S, Drechsel D, Unwin N, Mitchison T . Role of GTP hydrolysis in microtubule dynamics: information from a slowly hydrolyzable analogue, GMPCPP. Mol Biol Cell. 1992; 3(10):1155-67. PMC: 275679. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.3.10.1155. View