Inhibition of Base Editors with Anti-deaminases Derived from Viruses

Overview

Journal Nat Commun

Specialty Biology

Date 2022 Feb 2

PMID 35105899

Authors

Zhiquan Liu

Siyu Chen

Liangxue Lai

Zhanjun Li

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Cytosine base editors (CBEs), combining cytidine deaminases with the Cas9 nickase (nCas9), enable targeted C-to-T conversions in genomic DNA and are powerful genome-editing tools used in biotechnology and medicine. However, the overexpression of cytidine deaminases in vivo leads to unexpected potential safety risks, such as Cas9-independent off-target effects. This risk makes the development of deaminase off switches for modulating CBE activity an urgent need. Here, we report the repurpose of four virus-derived anti-deaminases (Ades) that efficiently inhibit APOBEC3 deaminase-CBEs. We demonstrate that they antagonize CBEs by inhibiting the APOBEC3 catalytic domain, relocating the deaminases to the extranuclear region or degrading the whole CBE complex. By rationally engineering the deaminase domain, other frequently used base editors, such as CGBE, A&CBE, A&CGBE, rA1-CBE and ABE8e, can be moderately inhibited by Ades, expanding the scope of their applications. As a proof of concept, the Ades in this study dramatically decrease both Cas9-dependent and Cas9-independent off-target effects of CBEs better than traditional anti-CRISPRs (Acrs). Finally, we report the creation of a cell type-specific CBE-ON switch based on a microRNA-responsive Ade vector, showing its practicality. In summary, these natural deaminase-specific Ades are tools that can be used to regulate the genome-engineering functions of BEs.

Citing Articles

Molecular breeding of pigs in the genome editing era.

Chen J, Wang J, Zhao H, Tan X, Yan S, Zhang H Genet Sel Evol. 2025; 57(1):12.

PMID: 40065264 PMC: 11892312. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-025-00961-7.

Programming ADAR-recruiting hairpin RNA sensor to detect endogenous molecules.

Qin P, Chen P, Tan L, Chu X, Ye B, Yin B Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 53(1.

PMID: 39673485 PMC: 11724285. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae1146.

Gene editing therapy for cardiovascular diseases.

Wu X, Yang J, Zhang J, Song Y MedComm (2020). 2024; 5(7):e639.

PMID: 38974714 PMC: 11224995. DOI: 10.1002/mco2.639.

Genome-edited rabbits: Unleashing the potential of a promising experimental animal model across diverse diseases.

Han Y, Zhou J, Zhang R, Liang Y, Lai L, Li Z Zool Res. 2024; 45(2):253-262.

PMID: 38287906 PMC: 11017087. DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2023.201.

Engineered domain-inlaid Nme2Cas9 adenine base editors with increased on-target DNA editing and targeting scope.

Zhao D, Gao X, Zhou J, Li J, Qian Y, Wang D BMC Biol. 2023; 21(1):250.

PMID: 37946200 PMC: 10636962. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-023-01754-4.

References

McCann J, Salamango D, Law E, Brown W, Harris R . MagnEdit-interacting factors that recruit DNA-editing enzymes to single base targets. Life Sci Alliance. 2020; 3(4). PMC: 7043409. DOI: 10.26508/lsa.201900606. View

Shan H, Liu Z, Jia Y, Chen S, Chen M, Song Y . Reduced off-target effect of NG-BE4max by using NG-HiFi system. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2021; 25:168-172. PMC: 8368781. DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2021.05.012. View

Jia K, Cui Y, Huang S, Yu P, Lian Z, Ma P . Phage peptides mediate precision base editing with focused targeting window. Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):1662. PMC: 8964698. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29365-7. View

Liu Z, Shan H, Chen S, Chen M, Zhang Q, Lai L . Improved base editor for efficient editing in GC contexts in rabbits with an optimized AID-Cas9 fusion. FASEB J. 2019; 33(8):9210-9219. DOI: 10.1096/fj.201900476RR. View

Chen K, Harjes E, Gross P, Fahmy A, Lu Y, Shindo K . Structure of the DNA deaminase domain of the HIV-1 restriction factor APOBEC3G. Nature. 2008; 452(7183):116-9. DOI: 10.1038/nature06638. View

Gaur R, Strebel K . Insights into the dual activity of SIVmac239 Vif against human and African green monkey APOBEC3G. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e48850. PMC: 3506583. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048850. View

Zhou C, Sun Y, Yan R, Liu Y, Zuo E, Gu C . Off-target RNA mutation induced by DNA base editing and its elimination by mutagenesis. Nature. 2019; 571(7764):275-278. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1314-0. View

Mathony J, Harteveld Z, Schmelas C, Upmeier Zu Belzen J, Aschenbrenner S, Sun W . Computational design of anti-CRISPR proteins with improved inhibition potency. Nat Chem Biol. 2020; 16(7):725-730. DOI: 10.1038/s41589-020-0518-9. View

Kvach M, Barzak F, Harjes S, Schares H, Kurup H, Jones K . Differential Inhibition of APOBEC3 DNA-Mutator Isozymes by Fluoro- and Non-Fluoro-Substituted 2'-Deoxyzebularine Embedded in Single-Stranded DNA. Chembiochem. 2019; 21(7):1028-1035. PMC: 7142307. DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201900505. View

10.

Koblan L, Arbab M, Shen M, Hussmann J, Anzalone A, Doman J . Efficient C•G-to-G•C base editors developed using CRISPRi screens, target-library analysis, and machine learning. Nat Biotechnol. 2021; 39(11):1414-1425. PMC: 8985520. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-021-00938-z. View

11.

Rauch B, Silvis M, Hultquist J, Waters C, McGregor M, Krogan N . Inhibition of CRISPR-Cas9 with Bacteriophage Proteins. Cell. 2017; 168(1-2):150-158.e10. PMC: 5235966. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.009. View

12.

Doman J, Raguram A, Newby G, Liu D . Evaluation and minimization of Cas9-independent off-target DNA editing by cytosine base editors. Nat Biotechnol. 2020; 38(5):620-628. PMC: 7335424. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0414-6. View

13.

Maji B, Gangopadhyay S, Lee M, Shi M, Wu P, Heler R . A High-Throughput Platform to Identify Small-Molecule Inhibitors of CRISPR-Cas9. Cell. 2019; 177(4):1067-1079.e19. PMC: 7182439. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.009. View

14.

Komor A, Kim Y, Packer M, Zuris J, Liu D . Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature. 2016; 533(7603):420-4. PMC: 4873371. DOI: 10.1038/nature17946. View

15.

Yu Y, Leete T, Born D, Young L, Barrera L, Lee S . Cytosine base editors with minimized unguided DNA and RNA off-target events and high on-target activity. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):2052. PMC: 7189382. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15887-5. View

16.

Shaban N, Yan R, Shi K, Moraes S, Cheng A, Carpenter M . Cryo-EM structure of the EBV ribonucleotide reductase BORF2 and mechanism of APOBEC3B inhibition. Sci Adv. 2022; 8(17):eabm2827. PMC: 9045721. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abm2827. View

17.

Deng J, Chen M, Liu Z, Song Y, Sui T, Lai L . The disrupted balance between hair follicles and sebaceous glands in Hoxc13-ablated rabbits. FASEB J. 2018; 33(1):1226-1234. DOI: 10.1096/fj.201800928RR. View

18.

Salter J, Bennett R, Smith H . The APOBEC Protein Family: United by Structure, Divergent in Function. Trends Biochem Sci. 2016; 41(7):578-594. PMC: 4930407. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.05.001. View

19.

Liang M, Sui T, Liu Z, Chen M, Liu H, Shan H . AcrIIA5 Suppresses Base Editors and Reduces Their Off-Target Effects. Cells. 2020; 9(8). PMC: 7463901. DOI: 10.3390/cells9081786. View

20.

Guo Y, Dong L, Qiu X, Wang Y, Zhang B, Liu H . Structural basis for hijacking CBF-β and CUL5 E3 ligase complex by HIV-1 Vif. Nature. 2014; 505(7482):229-33. DOI: 10.1038/nature12884. View