» Articles » PMID: 35096018

Episodes of Rapid Recovery of the Functional Activity of the Gene in the Evolutionary History of Phylogenetically Distant Species

Overview
Journal Front Genet
Date 2022 Jan 31
PMID 35096018
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As assemblies of genomes of new species with varying degrees of relationship appear, it becomes obvious that structural rearrangements of the genome, such as inversions, translocations, and transposon movements, are an essential and often the main source of evolutionary variation. In this regard, the following questions arise. How conserved are the regulatory regions of genes? Do they have a common evolutionary origin? And how and at what rate is the functional activity of genes restored during structural changes in the promoter region? In this article, we analyze the evolutionary history of the formation of the regulatory region of the gene in different lineages of the genus , as well as the participation of mobile elements in structural rearrangements and in the replacement of specific areas of the promoter region with those of independent evolutionary origin. In the process, we substantiate hypotheses about the selection of promoter elements from a number of frequently repeated motifs with different degrees of degeneracy in the ancestral sequence, as well as about the restoration of the minimum required set of regulatory sequences using a conversion mechanism or similar.

References
1.
Tamura K . Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G+C-content biases. Mol Biol Evol. 1992; 9(4):678-87. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040752. View

2.
Spradling A, Stern D, Beaton A, Rhem E, Laverty T, Mozden N . The Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project gene disruption project: Single P-element insertions mutating 25% of vital Drosophila genes. Genetics. 1999; 153(1):135-77. PMC: 1460730. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/153.1.135. View

3.
Hedges D, Deininger P . Inviting instability: Transposable elements, double-strand breaks, and the maintenance of genome integrity. Mutat Res. 2006; 616(1-2):46-59. PMC: 1850990. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.11.021. View

4.
Stormo G . Modeling the specificity of protein-DNA interactions. Quant Biol. 2014; 1(2):115-130. PMC: 4101922. DOI: 10.1007/s40484-013-0012-4. View

5.
Parks A, Cook K, Belvin M, Dompe N, Fawcett R, Huppert K . Systematic generation of high-resolution deletion coverage of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Nat Genet. 2004; 36(3):288-92. DOI: 10.1038/ng1312. View