» Articles » PMID: 35088479

Safety Climate in Hospitals: A Cross-sectional Study on the Perspectives of Nurses and Midwives

Overview
Journal J Nurs Manag
Specialty Nursing
Date 2022 Jan 28
PMID 35088479
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: To explore nurses' and midwives' perspectives of safety climate in Austrian hospitals as measurable elements of safety culture and to identify areas of quality improvement.

Background: Due to close contact with patients, nurses and midwives play a vital role in ensuring patient safety.

Method: An online survey among 713 nurses and midwives was conducted, using the 19-item Safety Climate Survey (SCS). To answer the survey, a 5-point Likert scale was provided with higher ratings indicating a more positive safety climate.

Results: Results demonstrate a positive safety culture (MD 4.09, SD 0.53). Significant group differences in overall safety climate score could be found regarding nurses and midwives in managerial positions, between gender and participants age with low effect size. High item missing rates focus aspects on management/leadership, institutional concerns, leadership by physicians, and handling of adverse events. In addition, these items present the lowest ratings in safety climate.

Conclusion: Results indicate potentials for optimization in the areas of leadership communication and feedback, the handling of safety concerns, and visibility or improvement of patient safety strategies.

Implications For Nursing Management: A regular, standardized safety climate measurement can be a valuable tool for nurse managers and (political) decision-makers to manage patient safety initiatives.

Citing Articles

Predictors of response rates of safety culture questionnaires in healthcare: a systematic review and analysis.

Ellis L, Pomare C, Churruca K, Carrigan A, Meulenbroeks I, Saba M BMJ Open. 2022; 12(9):e065320.

PMID: 36113948 PMC: 9486325. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065320.


Safety climate in hospitals: A cross-sectional study on the perspectives of nurses and midwives.

Glarcher M, Kaiser K, Kutschar P, Nestler N J Nurs Manag. 2022; 30(3):742-749.

PMID: 35088479 PMC: 9314869. DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13551.

References
1.
Kanerva A, Lammintakanen J, Kivinen T . Patient safety in psychiatric inpatient care: a literature review. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012; 20(6):541-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01949.x. View

2.
Mascherek A, Bezzola P, Gehring K, Schwappach D . Effect of a two-year national quality improvement program on surgical checklist implementation. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016; 114:39-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2016.04.003. View

3.
Levine K, Carmody M, Silk K . The influence of organizational culture, climate and commitment on speaking up about medical errors. J Nurs Manag. 2019; 28(1):130-138. DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12906. View

4.
Ausserhofer D, Schubert M, Engberg S, Blegen M, De G, Schwendimann R . Nurse-reported patient safety climate in Swiss hospitals: a descriptive-explorative substudy of the Swiss RN4CAST study. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012; 142:w13501. DOI: 10.4414/smw.2012.13501. View

5.
Alsalem G, Bowie P, Morrison J . Assessing safety climate in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of the adequacy of the psychometric properties of survey measurement tools. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1):353. PMC: 5946435. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3167-x. View