» Articles » PMID: 35087199

Precision Cancer Genome Testing Needs Proficiency Testing Involving All Stakeholders

Abstract

To implement precision oncology, analytical validity as well as clinical validity and utility are important. However, proficiency testing (PT) to assess validity has not yet been systematically performed in Japan. To investigate the quality of next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms and cancer genome testing prevalent in laboratories, we performed pilot PT using patient samples. We prepared genomic DNA from the cancer tissue and peripheral blood of 5 cancer patients and distributed these to 15 laboratories. Most participating laboratories successfully identified the pathogenic variants, except for two closely located KRAS variants and 25 bp delins in EGFR. Conversely, the EGFR L858R variant was successfully identified, and the allele frequency was similar for all the laboratories. A high DNA integrity number led to excellent depth and reliable NGS results. By conducting this pilot study using patient samples, we were able to obtain a glimpse of the current status of cancer genome testing at participating laboratories. To enhance domestic cancer genome testing, it is important to conduct local PT and to involve the parties concerned as organizers and participants.

Citing Articles

Importance of EQA/PT for the detection of genetic variants in comprehensive cancer genome testing.

Matsushita K, Ishige T, Watanabe K, Akahane T, Tanimoto A, Yoshimoto M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1036.

PMID: 39762492 PMC: 11704004. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84714-4.


The discrepancy of somatic BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants from two different platforms in epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer.

Kim J, Shin J, Park S, Seo S, Kang S, Yoo C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25879.

PMID: 39468117 PMC: 11519512. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75230-6.


Multicentric pilot study to standardize clinical whole exome sequencing (WES) for cancer patients.

Menzel M, Ossowski S, Kral S, Metzger P, Horak P, Marienfeld R NPJ Precis Oncol. 2023; 7(1):106.

PMID: 37864096 PMC: 10589320. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-023-00457-x.

References
1.
Zhang R, Ding J, Han Y, Yi L, Xie J, Yang X . The reliable assurance of detecting somatic mutations in cancer-related genes by next-generation sequencing: the results of external quality assessment in China. Oncotarget. 2016; 7(36):58500-58515. PMC: 5295447. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11306. View

2.
Ritterhouse L, Barletta J . BRAF V600E mutation-specific antibody: A review. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2015; 32(5):400-8. DOI: 10.1053/j.semdp.2015.02.010. View

3.
Spence T, Stickle N, Yu C, Chow H, Feilotter H, Lo B . Inter-laboratory proficiency testing scheme for tumour next-generation sequencing in Ontario: a pilot study. Curr Oncol. 2020; 26(6):e717-e732. PMC: 6927773. DOI: 10.3747/co.26.5379. View

4.
Singh R . Next-Generation Sequencing in High-Sensitive Detection of Mutations in Tumors: Challenges, Advances, and Applications. J Mol Diagn. 2020; 22(8):994-1007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.04.213. View

5.
Tack V, Spans L, Schuuring E, Keppens C, Zwaenepoel K, Pauwels P . Describing the Reportable Range Is Important for Reliable Treatment Decisions: A Multiple Laboratory Study for Molecular Tumor Profiling Using Next-Generation Sequencing. J Mol Diagn. 2018; 20(6):743-753. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.06.006. View