» Articles » PMID: 32993713

Costing the Implementation of Public Health Interventions in Resource-limited Settings: a Conceptual Framework

Overview
Journal Implement Sci
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2020 Sep 30
PMID 32993713
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Failing to account for the resources required to successfully implement public health interventions can lead to an underestimation of costs and budget impact, optimistic cost-effectiveness estimates, and ultimately a disconnect between published evidence and public health decision-making.

Methods: We developed a conceptual framework for assessing implementation costs. We illustrate the use of this framework with case studies involving interventions for tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS in resource-limited settings.

Results: Costs of implementing public health interventions may be conceptualized as occurring across three phases: design, initiation, and maintenance. In the design phase, activities include developing intervention components and establishing necessary infrastructure (e.g., technology, standard operating procedures). Initiation phase activities include training, initiation of supply chains and quality assurance procedures, and installation of equipment. Implementation costs in the maintenance phase include ongoing technical support, monitoring and evaluation, and troubleshooting unexpected obstacles. Within each phase, implementation costs can be incurred at the site of delivery ("site-specific" costs) or more centrally ("above-service" or "central" costs). For interventions evaluated in the context of research studies, implementation costs should be classified as programmatic, research-related, or shared research/program costs. Purely research-related costs are often excluded from analysis of programmatic implementation.

Conclusions: In evaluating public health interventions in resource-limited settings, accounting for implementation costs enables more realistic estimates of budget impact and cost-effectiveness and provides important insights into program feasibility, scale-up, and sustainability. Assessment of implementation costs should be planned prospectively and performed in a standardized manner to ensure generalizability.

Citing Articles

Association between statin use and 30-day mortality among patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a retrospective cohort study.

Chen J, Chen J, Li L Front Neurol. 2025; 15():1371314.

PMID: 39801716 PMC: 11720963. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1371314.


A systematic review of experimentally tested implementation strategies across health and human service settings: evidence from 2010-2022.

Ashcraft L, Goodrich D, Hero J, Phares A, Bachrach R, Quinn D Implement Sci. 2024; 19(1):43.

PMID: 38915102 PMC: 11194895. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01369-5.


Scaling up a brief alcohol intervention to prevent HIV infection in Vietnam: a cluster randomized, implementation trial.

Bartels S, Phan H, Hutton H, Nhan D, Sripaipan T, Chen J Implement Sci. 2024; 19(1):40.

PMID: 38867283 PMC: 11170841. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01368-6.


Developing a Program Costs Checklist of Digital Health Interventions: A Scoping Review and Empirical Case Study.

Khan Z, Kidholm K, Pedersen S, Haga S, Drozd F, Sundrehagen T Pharmacoeconomics. 2024; 42(6):663-678.

PMID: 38530596 PMC: 11126496. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01366-y.


Data-driven decision-making for district health management: a cluster-randomised study in 24 districts of Ethiopia.

Avan B, Dubale M, Taye G, Marchant T, Persson L, Schellenberg J BMJ Glob Health. 2024; 9(2).

PMID: 38423549 PMC: 10910485. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014140.


References
1.
MacPherson P, Houben R, Glynn J, Corbett E, Kranzer K . Pre-treatment loss to follow-up in tuberculosis patients in low- and lower-middle-income countries and high-burden countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2014; 92(2):126-38. PMC: 3949536. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.13.124800. View

2.
Scheirer M, Dearing J . An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health programs. Am J Public Health. 2011; 101(11):2059-67. PMC: 3222409. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300193. View

3.
Clouse K, Page-Shipp L, Dansey H, Moatlhodi B, Scott L, Bassett J . Implementation of Xpert MTB/RIF for routine point-of-care diagnosis of tuberculosis at the primary care level. S Afr Med J. 2012; 102(10):805-7. DOI: 10.7196/samj.5851. View

4.
Chandrashekar S, Guinness L, Pickles M, Shetty G, Alary M, Vickerman P . The costs of scaling up HIV prevention for high risk groups: lessons learned from the Avahan Programme in India. PLoS One. 2014; 9(9):e106582. PMC: 4159262. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106582. View

5.
Shete P, Nalugwa T, Farr K, Ojok C, Nantale M, Howlett P . Feasibility of a streamlined tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment initiation strategy. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017; 21(7):746-752. PMC: 5479151. DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0699. View