» Articles » PMID: 35081990

Robust Host Source Tracking Building on the Divergent and Non-stochastic Assembly of Gut Microbiomes in Wild and Farmed Large Yellow Croaker

Overview
Journal Microbiome
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Genetics
Microbiology
Date 2022 Jan 27
PMID 35081990
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Given the lack of genetic background, the source tracking unknown individuals of fish species with both farmed and wild populations often cannot be robustly achieved. The gut microbiome, which is shaped by both deterministic and stochastic processes, can serve as a molecular marker of fish host source tracking, particularly as an alternative to the yet-to-be-established host genetic marker. A candidate for testing the feasibility is the large yellow croaker, Larimichthys crocea, which is carnivorous and ranks the top mariculture fish in China. Wild resource of this fish was depleted decades ago and might have potential problematic estimation because of escaping of farmed individuals.

Results: The rectums of wild (n = 212) and farmed (n = 79) croakers from multiple batches were collected for the profiling of their gut bacterial communities. The farmed individuals had a higher alpha diversity and lower bacterial load than the wild individuals. The gut microbiota of the two sources exhibited divergence and high inter-batch variation, as featured by the dominance of Psychrobacter spp. in the wild group. Predicted functional capacity of the gut microbiome and representative isolates showed differences in terms of host source. This difference can be linked to the potential diet divergence between farmed and wild fishes. The non-stochastic distribution pattern of the core gut microbiota of the wild and farmed individuals supports the feasibility of microbiota-based host source tracking via the machine learning algorithm. A random forest classifier based on the divergence and non-stochastic assembly of the gut microbiome was robust in terms of host source tracking the individuals from all batches of croaker, including a newly introduced batch.

Conclusions: Our study revealed the divergence of gut microbiota and related functional profiles between wild and farmed croakers. For the first time, with representative datasets and non-stochastic patterns, we have verified that gut microbiota can be robustly applied to the tracking of host source even in carnivorous fish. Video abstract.

Citing Articles

The Assembly of Fish Gut Microbiomes Through Habitat Variation Provides Insight Into Redbelly Tilapia Invading a Large Subtropical River.

Liu Y, Li X, Li Y, Li H, Li J Ecol Evol. 2025; 15(2):e70945.

PMID: 39944910 PMC: 11814482. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70945.


Warming-driven migration of enterotypes mediates host health and disease statuses in ectotherm Litopenaeus vannamei.

Zeng S, Huang Z, Kriengkrai S, Zhou R, Yuan D, Tun N Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):126.

PMID: 39865129 PMC: 11770195. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07558-2.


Microbial communities associated with the skin, gill, and gut of large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea).

Wang J, Hu C, Tong X, Gao Y, Liang R, Liu C BMC Microbiol. 2025; 25(1):16.

PMID: 39799309 PMC: 11724461. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-024-03695-6.


Long-Read Sequencing Revealing the Effectiveness of Captive Breeding Strategy for Improving the Gut Microbiota of Spotted Seal (Phoca largha).

Du J, Wang Z, Xing Y, Gao X, Lu Z, Li D Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2024; 27(1):9.

PMID: 39589560 DOI: 10.1007/s10126-024-10397-7.


Comparative gut microbiome research through the lens of ecology: theoretical considerations and best practices.

Degregori S, Wang X, Kommala A, Schulhof N, Moradi S, MacDonald A Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024; 100(2):748-763.

PMID: 39530277 PMC: 11885713. DOI: 10.1111/brv.13161.


References
1.
Ley R, Hamady M, Lozupone C, Turnbaugh P, Ramey R, Bircher J . Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science. 2008; 320(5883):1647-51. PMC: 2649005. DOI: 10.1126/science.1155725. View

2.
Rawls J, Mahowald M, Ley R, Gordon J . Reciprocal gut microbiota transplants from zebrafish and mice to germ-free recipients reveal host habitat selection. Cell. 2006; 127(2):423-33. PMC: 4839475. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.043. View

3.
Kembel S, Cowan P, Helmus M, Cornwell W, Morlon H, Ackerly D . Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26(11):1463-4. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq166. View

4.
Li P, Wu G . Roles of dietary glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline in collagen synthesis and animal growth. Amino Acids. 2017; 50(1):29-38. DOI: 10.1007/s00726-017-2490-6. View

5.
Bolger A, Lohse M, Usadel B . Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(15):2114-20. PMC: 4103590. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. View