» Articles » PMID: 35076537

A Randomized, Open-Label Study to Assess Efficacy of Weekly Assumption of Cholecalciferol Versus Calcifediol in Older Patients with Hypovitaminosis D

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2022 Jan 25
PMID 35076537
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this single-center, open-label, randomized controlled study was to evaluate which formulation of vitamin D-between cholecalciferol and calcifediol-is most effective in the treatment of hypovitaminosis D in older adults. Demographic characteristics, clinical history, and comprehensive geriatric assessment were recorded at admission. Eligible patients were randomly assigned an equivalent vitamin D supplement, either with cholecalciferol or calcifediol, from the time of hospital admission to three months after discharge. Among the 140 older patients included (mean age 83 ± 6.6 years, 57.8% females), 69 received cholecalciferol and 71 received calcifediol. The mean plasma values of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25OH-vitamin D3) found at the time of enrollment were 16.8 ± 9.9 ng/mL in patients receiving cholecalciferol and 18.8 ± 13.3 ng/mL in those treated with calcifediol ( = 0.31). At the three month follow-up, the mean concentration of 25OH-vitamin D3 was significantly higher in patients treated with calcifediol than in those receiving cholecalciferol (30.7 ± 8.4 vs. 45.4 ± 9.8 ng/mL, respectively; < 0.001). Supplementation with either cholecalciferol or calcifediol effectively results in reaching the optimal circulating values of 25OH-vitamin D3 in older patients suffering from hypovitaminosis D. However, supplementation with calcifediol led to average circulating values of 25OH-vitamin D3 that were significantly higher (over 50%) than those obtained with cholecalciferol.

Citing Articles

Understanding the Role of Vitamin D in Heart Failure.

Tappia P, Lopez R, Fitzpatrick-Wong S, Ramjiawan B Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 24(4):111.

PMID: 39076268 PMC: 11273064. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2404111.


Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin D, including the derivation of a conversion factor for calcidiol monohydrate.

Turck D, Bohn T, Castenmiller J, de Henauw S, Hirsch-Ernst K, Knutsen H EFSA J. 2023; 21(8):e08145.

PMID: 37560437 PMC: 10407748. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8145.


Vitamin D Endocrine System and COVID-19: Treatment with Calcifediol.

Quesada-Gomez J, Lopez-Miranda J, Entrenas-Castillo M, Casado-Diaz A, Nogues Y Solans X, Mansur J Nutrients. 2022; 14(13).

PMID: 35807895 PMC: 9268645. DOI: 10.3390/nu14132716.


Treatment of Vitamin D Deficiency with Calcifediol: Efficacy and Safety Profile and Predictability of Efficacy.

Perez-Castrillon J, Usategui-Martin R, Pludowski P Nutrients. 2022; 14(9).

PMID: 35565910 PMC: 9102909. DOI: 10.3390/nu14091943.

References
1.
Bikle D . Vitamin D and bone. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2012; 10(2):151-9. PMC: 3688475. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-012-0098-z. View

2.
Pike J, Christakos S . Biology and Mechanisms of Action of the Vitamin D Hormone. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2017; 46(4):815-843. PMC: 5762112. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecl.2017.07.001. View

3.
Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry P . Assessing the nutritional status of the elderly: The Mini Nutritional Assessment as part of the geriatric evaluation. Nutr Rev. 1996; 54(1 Pt 2):S59-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1996.tb03793.x. View

4.
Bouillon R, Carmeliet G, Verlinden L, van Etten E, Verstuyf A, Luderer H . Vitamin D and human health: lessons from vitamin D receptor null mice. Endocr Rev. 2008; 29(6):726-76. PMC: 2583388. DOI: 10.1210/er.2008-0004. View

5.
Perez-Castrillon J, Duenas-Laita A, Brandi M, Jodar E, Del Pino-Montes J, Quesada-Gomez J . Calcifediol is superior to cholecalciferol in improving vitamin D status in postmenopausal women: a randomized trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2021; 36(10):1967-1978. PMC: 8597097. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4387. View