» Articles » PMID: 35070022

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Biliary Drainage-current Status and Future Perspectives

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with stenting is the treatment modality of choice for patients with benign and malignant bile duct obstruction. ERCP could fail in cases of duodenal obstruction, duodenal diverticulum, ampullary neoplastic infiltration or surgically altered anatomy. In these cases percutaneous biliary drainage (PTBD) is traditionally used as a rescue procedure but is related to high morbidity and mortality and lower quality of life. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is a relatively new interventional procedure that arose due to the development of curvilinear echoendoscope and the various endoscopic devices. A large amount of data is already collected that proves its efficacy, safety and ability to replace PTBD in cases of ERCP failure. It is also possible that EUS-BD could be chosen as a first-line treatment option in some clinical scenarios in the near future. Several EUS-BD techniques are developed EUS-guided transmural stenting, antegrade stenting and rendezvous technique and can be personalized depending on the individual anatomy. EUS-BD is normally performed in the same session from the same endoscopist in case of ERCP failure. The lack of training, absence of enough dedicated devices and lack of standardization still makes EUS-BD a difficult and not very popular procedure, which is related to life-threatening adverse events. Developing training models, dedicated devices and guidelines hopefully will make EUS-BD easier, safer and well accepted in the future. This paper focuses on the technical aspects of the different EUS-BD procedures, available literature data, advantages, negative aspects and the future perspectives of these modalities.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage in the treatment of advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhou H, Liu C, Yu X, Su M, Yan J, Shi X BMC Gastroenterol. 2024; 24(1):302.

PMID: 39243020 PMC: 11378551. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03397-3.


The Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Endoscopic Ultrasound Connection: Unity Is Strength, or the Endoscopic Ultrasonography Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Concept.

De Angelis C, DallAmico E, Staiano M, Gesualdo M, Bruno M, Gaia S Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(20).

PMID: 37892086 PMC: 10606726. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13203265.


Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangial Drainage for the Treatment of Malignant Obstructive Jaundice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Pang L, Wu S, Kong J Digestion. 2023; 104(2):85-96.

PMID: 36617409 PMC: 10015759. DOI: 10.1159/000528020.


Endoscopic salvage therapy after failed biliary cannulation using advanced techniques: A concise review.

Tsou Y, Pan K, Lee M, Lin C World J Gastroenterol. 2022; 28(29):3803-3813.

PMID: 36157537 PMC: 9367240. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i29.3803.

References
1.
Artifon E, Ferreira F, Otoch J, Rasslan S, Itoi T, Perez-Miranda M . EUS-guided biliary drainage: a review article. JOP. 2012; 13(1):7-17. View

2.
Salerno R, Davies S, Mezzina N, Ardizzone S . Comprehensive review on EUS-guided biliary drainage. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 11(5):354-364. PMC: 6556484. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.354. View

3.
Logiudice F, Bernardo W, Galetti F, Sagae V, Matsubayashi C, Madruga Neto A . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography biliary drainage for obstructed distal malignant biliary strictures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 11(4):281-291. PMC: 6475700. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i4.281. View

4.
Giovannini M, Moutardier V, Pesenti C, Bories E, Lelong B, Delpero J . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided bilioduodenal anastomosis: a new technique for biliary drainage. Endoscopy. 2001; 33(10):898-900. DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-17324. View

5.
Sharaiha R, Khan M, Kamal F, Tyberg A, Tombazzi C, Ali B . Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in comparison with percutaneous biliary drainage when ERCP fails: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 85(5):904-914. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.023. View